From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add nvi Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 12:18:25 +0200 Message-ID: <87bnqygwb2.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> References: <54047591.9080902@gmail.com> <5405975D.70604@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44817) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XOlAU-0006Jf-7x for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 06:18:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XOlAT-00044J-5E for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 06:18:30 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::231]:50193) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XOlAS-00043I-Sz for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 06:18:29 -0400 Received: by mail-lb0-f177.google.com with SMTP id z11so7323311lbi.36 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 03:18:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5405975D.70604@gmail.com> (Cyril Roelandt's message of "Tue, 02 Sep 2014 12:09:33 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Cyril Roelandt Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Cyril Roelandt writes: > Maybe we should have all vi-like editors in one file. We currently have > vim in gnu/packages/vim.scm, maybe we should have both nvi and vim in > gnu/packages/vi.scm, WDYT ? I think at least Vim is, on the meanwhile, a very different beast from any random vi implementation. (Don't know about nvi or others.) Do we have any guidelines regarding what packages go in what files, or is it determined on an "intuitive" basis? Taylan