Re: Reviews for wip-haskell-platform-7.10.2-a

[Paul van der Walt <paul@denknerd.org>]

Hey Eric,

Thank you for all the review-work!

On 2015-10-22 at 05:10, quoth ericbavier@openmailbox.org:
> I apologize in advance that so many of these comments pertain to the synopses
> and descriptions, but I find that aspect of packaging important, and Ludo was
> kind enough to write up the "Synopses and Descriptions" section in guix.info.

I guess that's the way it should be.  I admit that my descriptions are
often shoddy simply because i wasn't sure what the library does.  But of
course that's no excuse to not follow the style (e.g., sentence
fragments, formatting).

> Along the way I gave up trying to analyse and comment on inputs vs
> propagated-inputs.  The builds check out, and we can adjust later if needed.

Right.  I tried to be conservative with propagated-inputs, but at least
they all work...  I'm curious to see how the library search path patch
will influence things.

> In the absense of comments on a patch, assume a "LGTM!" :)

Okay, well, i'll deal with all the comments before merging anything.

> Thank you, Paul for all the effort,

Seems you went to a lot of effort too, thank you for your thorough
reviews!

On to a more Haskell-friendly Guix! :)

Cheers,
p.