From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Wingo Subject: Re: [PATCH] gtk+: Support GUIX_GTK{2,3}_PATH variables. Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 10:01:57 +0000 Message-ID: <87bna7g8a2.fsf@igalia.com> References: <877fkwotnw.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53302) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4QiE-0002ir-Gn for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 05:02:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4QiB-0007dO-BG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 05:02:06 -0500 Received: from pb-sasl0.int.icgroup.com ([208.72.237.25]:64390 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4QiB-0007dG-7E for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 05:02:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <877fkwotnw.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Thu, 03 Dec 2015 08:52:51 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel On Thu 03 Dec 2015 07:52, Ricardo Wurmus writes: > From b8120ae8e21e234ffd0eb9f5de1d7809a0860c45 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ricardo Wurmus > Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 08:32:06 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH 2/3] gnu: gtk+: Add patch to support GUIX_GTK3_PATH. > > * gnu/packages/patches/gtk3-respect-GUIX_GTK3_PATH: New file. > * gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add it. > * gnu/packages/gtk.scm (gtk+) [source]: Add patch. > [native-search-paths]: Add search path for GUIX_GTK3_PATH. > --- > gnu-system.am | 1 + > gnu/packages/gtk.scm | 9 +++++++-- > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Missing the gtk3 patch? Only question for me would be, would these patches with s/GUIX_// be accepted upstream? They should be submitted at least. Andy