From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nils Gillmann Subject: service: make hidden-service an alias of onion service Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 20:39:34 +0200 Message-ID: <87bn5uv6e1.fsf@grrlz.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59065) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1alhVa-0002AA-RG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:39:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1alhVV-0001be-Sr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:39:54 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:53584) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1alhVV-0001bS-M0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:39:49 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1alhVT-0000LX-WA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 20:39:48 +0200 Received: from xd9bb8ad5.dyn.telefonica.de ([217.187.138.213]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 20:39:47 +0200 Received: from niasterisk by xd9bb8ad5.dyn.telefonica.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 20:39:47 +0200 List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org It seems that recently the torproject started using the more appropriate term "onion service"[1] for what is known as "hidden service". I want to reflect this in the service for tor by making onion-service the used definition/name and hidden-service an alias for that to not break a percentage of systems which might already be using this. I need to further read into services, but I want to handle this to learn more about services. As I can't CC email accounts via newsreader interface, would this proposed backwards compability be okay for you ludovic? efraim and alirio in the chat also pointed out that we possibly might want to mark hidden-service as deprecated if possible. -- ng personal contact: http://krosos.sdf.org EDN: https://wiki.c3d2.de/EDN