From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: atlas: Use cpupower in description.
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 22:59:14 +0000
Message-ID: <87bn1h4bel.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
References: <20160719024520.9121-1-me@tobias.gr>
	<20160719024520.9121-3-me@tobias.gr> <8760s1e42x.fsf@gnu.org>
	<524055e2b85bfd9b153f173afcc0a024@tobias.gr>
	<87d1m95mh0.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57226)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1bSuGw-0002y0-IU
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 18:59:23 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1bSuGv-0008Bz-6y
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 18:59:22 -0400
Received: from mithlond.libertad.in-berlin.de ([2001:67c:1400:2490::1]:58474
	helo=beleriand.n0.is) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1bSuGu-0008Bd-Tt
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 18:59:21 -0400
Received: by beleriand.n0.is (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id c962746a
	TLS version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128
	verify=NO for <guix-devel@gnu.org>;
	Thu, 28 Jul 2016 22:59:17 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <87d1m95mh0.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: guix-devel@gnu.org

Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@gnu.org> writes:

> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr> writes:
>
>> Ludo',
>>
>> On 2016-07-19 23:00, ludo@gnu.org wrote:
>>> Applied, thanks!
>>
>> Thanks! I didn't know about @example.
>>
>> It seems like some Texinfo syntax is encouraged (like @command), but
>> not the full set (package descriptions are full of abbreviations,
>> but no @abbr or @acronym anywhere). Is this by design?
>
> Nope it is not by design, the Guile (texinfo ...) modules just don't
> implement these commands from GNU Texinfo, but should indeed.
>
> -- 
> Mathieu Lirzin
>

Is there a feature request / bug we could file somewhere on this? I
don't know what the upstream of Guile texinfo is, but it reads like it
should be extended.
-- 
♥Ⓐ  ng0
Current Keys: https://we.make.ritual.n0.is/ng0.txt
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org