From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: awesome: Add awesome-3.5
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 13:33:59 +0000
Message-ID: <87bn0f8xiw.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
References: <20160825030933.06c8d523@gmail.com>
	<87inup42zl.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<87wpj5gpeg.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<87oa4hgodk.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<87h9a8ucqw.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<20160825192611.759f04d0@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40454)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1bdHGk-00005m-43
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:34:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1bdHGj-0007wq-2t
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:34:02 -0400
Received: from mithlond.libertad.in-berlin.de ([2001:67c:1400:2490::1]:35457
	helo=beleriand.n0.is) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1bdHGi-0007vf-OX
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:34:01 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20160825192611.759f04d0@gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: doncatnip <gnopap@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

doncatnip <gnopap@gmail.com> writes:

> On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:47:19 +0000
> ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> wrote:
>
> I'm sorry, I just don't really know what to say about this as my
> experience with hardening is rather non-existant. I can sure find out
> how to disable dbus and submit another patch.

No, this was not my intention. The patch looks good to me.
Now only someone with commit access needs to review, as I do not have
commit access.

>> ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:
>> 
>> >> Works for me (written from inside a running awesome-3.5.9).  
>> >
>> > ng0@shadowwalker ~$ awesome --version
>> > awesome v3.5.9 (Mighty Ravendark)
>> > • Build: Sun Mar 06 14:05:54Z 2016 for x86_64 by gcc version 4.9.3
>> > (@) • Compiled against Lua 5.2.4 (running with Lua 5.2)
>> > • D-Bus support: ✔  
>> 
>> Great, the joy of a limited font... Nevermind this message then for
>> obvious reasons but rather take it as a note that dbus and hardening
>> is something we need to watch in the future ;)
>> 
>> > Having no dbus support will help with eventual hardening of Guix,
>> > but why do we not have it in awesome? 
>> > And why would we we need it (dbus support) at all? I don't even
>> > know why I used to build it with dbus support before. Works either
>> > way.  
>> 
>

-- 
ng0
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org