From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: awesome: Update to 3.5.9. Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 22:18:47 +0000 Message-ID: <87bn06t06w.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> References: <20160902005953.4d5caf74@gmail.com> <871t12k2ej.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <871t12xy34.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37246) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfwnU-0007X2-Qb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 18:18:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfwnT-0006NH-OI for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 18:18:52 -0400 Received: from mithlond.libertad.in-berlin.de ([2001:67c:1400:2490::1]:46036 helo=beleriand.n0.is) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfwnT-0006Me-BK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 18:18:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: gno , "guix-devel@gnu.org" gno writes: > On 9/2/2016 2:53 PM, ng0 wrote: > >> For some reason xrandr started to kill awesome (X11) session when I >> apply my layout now. I checked with arandr and also with --dryrun if my >> layout is the problem, but there's nothing faulty. >> Maybe there are changes which can't just be installed in my user profile >> and need to in system. > > Hmm, that's not good. No errors or other logs ? Could be unrelated. Could be because I did not launch it in a vm but in my actual live system. This is not a criteria to reject patches, if anything this is a bug on my end, and if it's a bug in the package, it is unlikely you introduced it (I would even say impossible, looking at the patches), there's nothing which could cause this. > Also, since I yet again didn't include the list in my previous response: > > On 9/2/2016 12:43 PM, ng0 wrote: > >> Hi, >> Thanks for your patches. >> It works, I'm currently using this patchset. >> Some minor improvements can be made (comments style) which in my opinion >> the person commiting your patch can apply. > > Please, I'd appreciate any hints as to how I could improve my comment > style. Don't hold back > > Thanks for testing. > -- ng0 For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org