From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andy Wingo <wingo@igalia.com>
Subject: Re: Cosmetical change: remove inconsistent "$file ends here"?
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 10:45:43 +0200
Message-ID: <87bmzb3v7s.fsf@igalia.com>
References: <871t09t6f1.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87a8ewl6tq.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87zimws5b1.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87mviv12p3.fsf@dustycloud.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50448)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <wingo@igalia.com>) id 1boRYV-0004d0-34
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 04:46:31 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <wingo@igalia.com>) id 1boRYQ-0002CU-VL
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 04:46:30 -0400
Received: from pb-sasl1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.66]:54706
	helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <wingo@igalia.com>) id 1boRYQ-0001yL-Qp
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 04:46:26 -0400
Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4121132EF4
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 04:45:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pb-sasl1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3883332EF3
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 04:45:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rusty (unknown [88.160.190.192])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 819C232EF2
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 04:45:46 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <87mviv12p3.fsf@dustycloud.org> (Christopher Allan Webber's
	message of "Mon, 26 Sep 2016 03:32:24 -0500")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Mon 26 Sep 2016 10:32, Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org> writes:

> It feels like cruft that nobody knows the reason for, or has a good
> reason in this modern age.  I'd rather they just be trimmed.
>
> But I also don't feel like it matters much, so whatever is decided is
> decided. :)

For what it's worth: +1 from me.  These things have cost in terms of
linting, code review, need for explaining to new people, and visual
ceremony, and they have very little benefit if any.

But, also like Christopher, I don't care strongly :)

Andy