From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lukas Gradl Subject: Re: [Patch 0/10] Add Ring Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 15:00:55 -0600 Message-ID: <87bmxjp01k.fsf@openmailbox.org> References: <87mvjc1quq.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87pomajzd9.fsf@gmail.com> <87pom4o7ch.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87y40ourp9.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50645) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c61tu-0007tc-5m for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Nov 2016 16:01:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c61tr-0001M5-4X for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Nov 2016 16:01:18 -0500 Received: from smtp20.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.54]:60208 helo=smtp5.openmailbox.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c61tq-0001Lx-Sm for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Nov 2016 16:01:15 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87y40ourp9.fsf@gnu.org> (Mike Gerwitz's message of "Sat, 12 Nov 2016 19:52:18 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mike Gerwitz Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Mike Gerwitz writes: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 12:07:10 -0600, Lukas Gradl wrote: >> If anyone would like to work on this patch series, please feel free to >> claim it as your own. I hope my work will be of some use. If nobody >> picks it up, I will be very happy to come back to it, but that will most >> likely not happen within the next two months. > > With that in mind, as part of the evaluation, the Ring team agreed to > create a build system that conforms to GNU standards. They're likely to > wrap their CMake system, but hopefully this change will make it easier > to package in the future. > > I don't know the timeline, though. There were some issues with the build system and the organization of the source code that I initially struggled with. I think this is very good news. Thank you! --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYKNSIAAoJEFP7dyh+2DCRDLQQAKc7AWKU8F06Y8q18evida5p xhb5+cTxwGcQmgw7Zh6Y4grgbGqO27GywFnGm4rGCZUc0/MkvJ7mchQA4zIknJYS pctKjSoxZ1ps67S8eU7hK3fmuh58PxpUXvMlyiZA/2+AUtEDiaVQWrdRYAYoDAjM 4OgVybCgoYf5QsXYzesaOO9HJoLJ/eribdiLWPpujS5KNZ8pEvsbIIPkC8omRiZW 8i84EUO6DJDKaJxlW0TyAqIgoAUhka0rW2EC94/bnhZ13qt/XPSLYzNST+cgee/e dvqSdDhbs5N0kcfSC0CPf/G+isX0nBfc6mFHjsiJm0a627ZFSb8Sl+E2RnFzRm+F H9d6GxhtsHalCqvj1NGUWpJRE8e+lebQvcEUjw/bHTE0xh0Qbg9dm3CmoOV4ajEl eUSPS/HLKkcWz/F7J40YWDNaVVxVfc71iI3YC+o9oAnzld3pn7H7vfXiB1Oe/gZP ouk1L3JlOBWMlM+Ipze5GksyuIi3Hr+Q7dvag0M4eN0FiJB2St5WBInUj7ixxgm7 THuck3xHWrfpduOYFQYgktzCsR8BCTSpa0TnP/5vREUkrWodcPeIKFGmy7r/2Gnw Sl+Ub3f12e1wK1AUfUtwpO/WZmH9MMtsl8Qi9SiE9W1cSCqRPDiHuk715hUSULxj iCmqRYqaAPvdZoCOaPmI =D0n0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--