From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: GuixSD on commodity hosting platforms, hoster: IN-Berlin Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 16:35:09 +0100 Message-ID: <87bmuacb4i.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20170209183609.5rztohnqhsleifll@wasp> <87wpczumkc.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33426) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccDET-0002GG-1v for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:35:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccDEN-0003TJ-Uq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:35:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87wpczumkc.fsf@gnu.org> (Jan Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Thu, 09 Feb 2017 21:38:27 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hey! Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis: > On the future of Guix-panel it was said (by Ludo'?) that getting GuixSD > on a mainstream hosting platform was very good to have. I think that was Chris but I agree that it would be great. Ludo=E2=80=99.