ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hello, > > Marius Bakke skribis: > >> Kei Kebreau writes: > > [...] > >>> The patches are in working order. The first patch would cause 1200 >>> rebuilds, but the second would only cause 128 rebuilds. Should I work on >>> splitting up the first patch into pieces that Hydra can handle under its >>> current load? >> >> I'm not actually sure what's best here. It may be easiest to just throw >> them both at 'staging' and accept the (hopefully few) merge conflicts. >> >> Ludo, any preference? > > The one that causes 128 rebuilds could go to ‘master’ (which is a good > thing: we won’t have conflicts with this part of the changes.) I've committed the 128-rebuild patch to the master branch. > > The rest could go to ‘staging’ I suppose. > >> If we're going staging, let's try to coordinate it so that we can start >> it shortly after adding them. Maybe midnight tomorrow or Saturday UTC? >> I have a few other updates in my queue that haven't been pushed yet. > > Sounds reasonable to me. I’ll let you coordinate. :-) > Marius, send me an email when you're ready! > Thanks for taking care of this! > :-) > Ludo’.