From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47345)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dwoNK-0003Mj-A0
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 07:50:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dwoNF-0005SG-UM
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 07:50:06 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51114)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1dwoNF-0005S3-Rx
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 07:50:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dwoNF-00039i-Ko
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 07:50:01 -0400
Subject: [bug#27922] [PATCH] gnu: python-numpy: Update to 1.12.1.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.27922.B27922.150642654212060@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <ae321749739c8fcd7297b70ac52a3aa1cd9028a6.1501703340.git.leo@famulari.name>
	<87d18dwwyi.fsf@fastmail.com> <20170802224834.GE14798@jasmine.lan>
	<87vaky1u0m.fsf@gnu.org> <cuca81h4wgc.fsf@thomasdanckaert.be>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 13:48:45 +0200
In-Reply-To: <cuca81h4wgc.fsf@thomasdanckaert.be> (Thomas Danckaert's message
	of "Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:53:55 +0200")
Message-ID: <87bmlxhe8y.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Thomas Danckaert <post@thomasdanckaert.be>
Cc: 27922@debbugs.gnu.org

Thomas Danckaert <post@thomasdanckaert.be> skribis:

> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:
>
>> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 10:12:21PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
>>>> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
>>>>=20
>>>> > * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-numpy, python2-numpy): Update to 1=
.12.1.
>>>>=20
>>>> LGTM ;-)
>>>>=20
>>>> > [source]: Download the "real" release tarball instead of the snapsho=
t.
>>>>=20
>>>> NumPy provides a PGP signature with the zipball on PyPi:
>>>>=20
>>>> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/numpy
>>>
>>> Good catch!
>>>
>>>> Is there a reason to prefer the GitHub release tarball?
>>>
>>> Not that I know of. I only chose this tarball because I saw it on the G=
itHub
>>> page. I'll try switching to PyPi.
>>
>> Leo, I think this fell through the cracks!  :-)
>>
>> Ludo'.
>
> I can push a modified patch (with the pypi source) if it's ok.  Is there
> any reason we would not update to version 1.13.1 rightaway?

If the dependents of NumPy build fine, I see no reason not to upgrade to
1.13.1.

Thanks for picking this up!

Ludo=E2=80=99.