From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Subject: bug#29186: building guile-emacs fails: required libaries not found: libjpeg Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 23:25:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87bmk4v6p6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87po8vm4iv.fsf@gnu.org> <874lq6hbxn.fsf@netris.org> <87h8u6m311.fsf@gnu.org> <878tfhlxia.fsf@gnu.org> <20171108101226.GD1815@macbook41> <87k1z0hlpr.fsf@gnu.org> <87po8kldgk.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43781) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eEjff-00023j-7n for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:27:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eEjfb-0001gh-6x for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:27:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60262) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eEjfb-0001gR-4I for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:27:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eEjfZ-00074J-LT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:27:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87po8kldgk.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Tue, 14 Nov 2017 23:09:31 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 29186@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: guile-emacs: Resurrect, fixes #29186. >> >> * gnu/packages/patches/guile-emacs-fix-configure.patch: New file. > I=E2=80=99m fine with this patch. I=E2=80=99m a bit concerned about the = risk of > accumulating patches that should really be in guile-emacs proper, > though. IMO it would be better if this patch were pushed to > guile-emacs, or if an alternate guile-emacs repo were set up if the > current one is inactive. If that=E2=80=99s too cumbersome though, feel f= ree to > push this patch! Meanwhile, I sent this patch 6 days ago to Robin Templeton . They were the most recent committer from where we're pulling. They haven't responded yet. Let me know if you know a better address/can we do better? I can wait a bit more and push if I don't hear anything the coming week. janneke --=20 Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE http://AvatarAcademy.com