From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36699) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eGiVn-0006Dn-NM for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 04:37:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eGiVi-0004dN-Oh for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 04:37:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39616) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eGiVi-0004dA-L1 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 04:37:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eGiVi-0006IP-9w for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 04:37:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#29158] [PATCH] gnu: ncurses: Update to 6.0-20170930. Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20171105133824.25101-1-mbakke@fastmail.com> <87wp2mtitx.fsf@fastmail.com> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:36:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87wp2mtitx.fsf@fastmail.com> (Marius Bakke's message of "Sun, 19 Nov 2017 15:59:54 +0100") Message-ID: <87bmjx5m1m.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 29158@debbugs.gnu.org Hello Marius! Marius Bakke skribis: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> * gnu/packages/ncurses.scm (ncurses): Update to 6.0-20170930. >> [source](patches): Remove. >> [source](uri): Adjust to version suffix. >> [arguments]: Add 'apply-rollup-patch' phase. >> [native-inputs]: Add a "rollup-patch" origin. >> * gnu/packages/patches/ncurses-CVE-2017-10684-10685.patch: Delete file. >> * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Remove it. > > Since there were no comments in two weeks, I have 'staged' this in my > local queue for core-updates and will push later today/tomorrow. Sounds reasonable. > Ludo: Is the kernel on Hydra upgraded now? Let's start a new 'core' > evaluation once this patch makes it. Yes, the kernel is upgraded. These =E2=80=9Ccore=E2=80=9D evaluations are = relatively cheap, so you can start new ones maybe not too often, but without fear (I just did.) Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.