From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: preparing the next release v0.15.0 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 11:42:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87bmccv11w.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87in6mbdkt.fsf@elephly.net> <20180614054636.pmoyt4sydtpmozmf@thebird.nl> <87efh9bws8.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49146) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fTlFA-0004B5-Sr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 05:42:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fTlF9-0008C2-UV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 05:42:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87efh9bws8.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Thu, 14 Jun 2018 10:24:39 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi! Ricardo Wurmus skribis: >> Can we aim for a v1.0 release? At least for the package manager? I am >> facing people that say Guix is not mature and therefore insecure and >> therefore they can justifiably ignore my pleas for installation >> without even looking. > > I would like to leave 1.0 for the future. > > Things that I=E2=80=99d like to see in 1.0 include a new manifest format = that > records more information about the version of Guix, retiring of > GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH, and more. Ditto. In terms of programming effort, we=E2=80=99re very close to what we= =E2=80=99ve been targeting for 1.0. Ludo=E2=80=99.