From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ANN] Emacs-Guix 0.5.1
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2019 02:21:17 +0300
Message-ID: <87bm4u668i.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87ftuo80es.fsf@gmail.com> <87imz4138y.fsf@jnanam.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggsout.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58808 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1gfvFq-0002mi-GL
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2019 18:21:23 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1gfvFh-0005H1-Bv
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2019 18:21:22 -0500
Received: from mail-lf1-x135.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::135]:41896)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1gfvFg-0005G6-PO
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2019 18:21:13 -0500
Received: by mail-lf1-x135.google.com with SMTP id c16so27742550lfj.8
	for <help-guix@gnu.org>; Sat, 05 Jan 2019 15:21:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87imz4138y.fsf@jnanam.net> (Benjamin Slade's message of "Fri, 04
	Jan 2019 15:12:29 -0700")
List-Id: <help-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:help-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Help-Guix" <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Benjamin Slade <slade@jnanam.net>
Cc: help-guix@gnu.org

Benjamin Slade (2019-01-04 15:12 -0700) wrote:

> I love Emacs-Guix - thank you for this.
>
> Relatedly - I'm trying to debug an issue: so on my both pure GuixSD
> machine and on my Arch machine with standalone Guix binary installer,
> =guix-all-packages= shows me 9213 packages, but on my Void machine with
> standalone Guix binary installer, the same command only shows me around
> 900(!) packages. But on the same machine, the expected full range of
> Guix packages are available in the terminal via =guix package=. What
> could cause Emacs-Guix to only show a subset of packages in this one
> case?

zimoun answered correctly.  I think it is the same problem as several
people have on non-GuixSD system.  Most likely, it will not be fixed on
Emacs-Guix side.  The only workaround I know is "guix package -i guix".

-- 
Alex