From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48930) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h6AJv-0005As-OR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 04:42:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h6AJu-0000KL-Ue for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 04:42:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35969) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h6AJu-0000Jc-F7 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 04:42:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h6AJu-0001p6-C7 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 04:42:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#34882] [PATCH] Update to Pandas, enable Excel writer support Resent-Message-ID: References: <87k1gzqy2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87sgvkxpel.fsf@elephly.net> <87ef73rj0x.fsf@gmail.com> <87a7hryfpi.fsf@elephly.net> <87r2b3mzqg.fsf@gmail.com> From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: <87r2b3mzqg.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 09:41:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87bm27mf32.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: 34882@debbugs.gnu.org Maxim Cournoyer writes: >>> deeptools@3.1.3 NOK >> >> I can=E2=80=99t reproduce this. I get a substitute for deeptools. > > It builds, but isn't reproducible. Try with --check and --no-grafts, it > should give you something like: guix build: error: derivation > `/gnu/store/7a80qjk898f7lhh46bjvv6mbbsrgaq5i-deeptools-3.1.3.drv' may > not be deterministic: output > `/gnu/store/f3z6fczw70j6692ddy467pbagbjck009-deeptools-3.1.3' differs Indeed. =E2=80=9Clib/python3.7/site-packages/deeptoolsintervals/tree.cpython-37m-x8= 6_64-linux-gnu.so=E2=80=9D differs, but looking at the diffoscope output I can=E2=80=99t figure out wh= y. >>> nanopolish@0.10.2-1.50e8b5c NOK >> >> I can=E2=80=99t reproduce this. I get a substitute for nanopolish. > > It builds, but isn't reproducible. Yes, here it=E2=80=99s =E2=80=9Cbin/nanopolish=E2=80=9D that differs. I=E2= =80=99ll investigate. [=E2=80=A6] > Thanks for the follow-up! Should we create tickets for the > reproducibility issues? Sure, thanks! -- Ricardo