From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kei Kebreau Subject: Re: Shall we merge wip-gnome3.30 to core-updates? Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 01:10:43 -0400 Message-ID: <87blyry14c.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87v9xgytui.fsf@posteo.net> <87blz77rbo.fsf@devup.no> <87ftod3ww4.fsf@posteo.net> <20190616085954.GA1460@macbook41> <871rzt51ye.fsf@devup.no> <87tvcpppyr.fsf@posteo.net> <87pnn9iav1.fsf@posteo.net> <87k1dhmej2.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59148) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1heBp7-0007OL-Dj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 01:10:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1heBp6-0001Jn-5O for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 01:10:53 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:53033) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1heBp5-0001FW-E5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 01:10:52 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDC102400FD for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 07:10:46 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87k1dhmej2.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Wed, 19 Jun 2019 23:49:37 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Hi Kei, > >> This could be partly caused by the fact that only some of the GNOME >> packages were updated to their 3.30 versions, but I don't know how GNOME >> works well enough to diagnose the issue right away. > > What GNOME packages that should be updated haven=E2=80=99t been updated ? > >> If this is okay, I can push the updates tomorrow. > > That=E2=80=99s fine. Then we=E2=80=99ll have to add the missing updates = in the days > after that. > > -- > Ricardo Alright! I've pushed the existing GNOME updates to core-updates. Below is a list of GNOME packages that are propagated in the "gnome" package definition that aren't at their highest 3.30 bug fix number or aren't updated to version 3.30 (or for differently-versioned packages, their latest stable version from what I can tell at a glance): baobab (gnome.scm) font-cantarell (fonts.scm) epiphany (gnome.scm) file-roller (gnome.scm) gedit (gnome.scm) glib-networking (gnome.scm) gnome-backgrounds (gnome.scm) gnome-calculator (gnome.scm) gnome-control-center (gnome.scm) gnome-online-accounts (gnome.scm) gnome-session (gnome.scm) gnome-settings-daemon (gnome.scm) gnome-terminal (gnome.scm) gucharmap (gnome.scm) gvfs (gnome.scm) nautilus (gnome.scm) shared-mime-info (gnome.scm) totem (gnome.scm) zenity (gnome.scm) Perhaps there's something there (mismatch between gnome-shell and gnome-control-center?) that affects the clock.