From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: Fixing ant-bootstrap / jamvm segfault (i686)
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:13:26 +0200
Message-ID: <87blv6gqjt.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <87v9tsped0.fsf@elephly.net>
 <CAE4v=ph7dsZsz1P_B+S93=hZLvLLFa1JOGFuAM0U-b3kXdVJvg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34283)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1iDkRj-0002mC-IJ
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 03:13:44 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1iDkRi-00029H-5d
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 03:13:43 -0400
In-reply-to: <CAE4v=ph7dsZsz1P_B+S93=hZLvLLFa1JOGFuAM0U-b3kXdVJvg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>, julien lepiller <roptat@lepiller.eu>


Hi G=C3=A1bor,

> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont: 2019. sz=
ept. 16.,
> H=C3=A9t 15:20):
>
>> Hi Guix,
>>
>> here=E2=80=99s a probably needlessly complicated patch to fix the build =
of
>> ant-bootstrap.  It currently fails to build because jamvm
>> segfaults.

[=E2=80=A6]

>> I=E2=80=99m almost certain that not all of these configure flags are nee=
ded.
>> What do you think?  Would someone like to play a little with this patch
>> and see if we can figure out why exactly jamvm segfaults?
>>
> I will try to have a look at this again in the coming days.
>
>>
>> I used this command to build ant-bootstrap:
>>
>>     ./pre-inst-env guix build -K --system=3Di686-linux -e '(@@ (gnu pack=
ages
>> java) ant-bootstrap)'

Have you been able to take a look at this?  I=E2=80=99d like to push this o=
r a variant
of it to the core-updates branch soon.

--=20
Ricardo