From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40130) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iLTuE-00014E-2g for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 11:11:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iLTuC-0001UG-Vv for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 11:11:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42597) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iLTuB-0001Ts-Mt for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 11:11:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iLTuB-0000qv-Gi for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 11:11:03 -0400 Subject: bug#37613: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-httpie. Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: From: Oleg Pykhalov References: <20191004065520.tcuz74tsjgqfbh6q@rafflesia> <20191014114320.fmiev2vxisikagf7@rafflesia> <878spj6sfu.fsf@gmail.com> <20191018125015.lawklnqyxxrljq7c@rafflesia> Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 18:09:52 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20191018125015.lawklnqyxxrljq7c@rafflesia> (Tanguy Le Carrour's message of "Fri, 18 Oct 2019 14:50:15 +0200") Message-ID: <87bluedr9b.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Tanguy Le Carrour Cc: 37613@debbugs.gnu.org, 37613-done@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tanguy Le Carrour writes: > Hi Oleg! > > > Le 10/17, Oleg Pykhalov a =C3=A9crit : >> What do you think about naming the package =E2=80=9Chttpie=E2=80=9D inst= ead, because >> it's intended to run by calling =E2=80=98httpie=E2=80=99 command as in = =E2=80=98youtube-dl=E2=80=99 >> package? I could change the name if you don't mind and push it. > > I have no opinion on this! I package cookiecutter as > `python-cookiecutter`, so I did the same with httpie. > The only problem is that the binary is actually called `http`. Well, =E2=80=98http=E2=80=99 as a package name is not good IMO ;-) httpie as named in Debian and Nix should be good enough. Pushed to master. > Should I consider doing the same for the package `python-poetry` I've sub= mitted?! Yes, just a =E2=80=98poetry=E2=80=99. Thanks, Oleg. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEcjhxI46s62NFSFhXFn+OpQAa+pwFAl2p1cAACgkQFn+OpQAa +px1GA//Wn5zRjaFzF5oKWbn0mh91KwblVTKGJI24itSm73yg6vpCBH2QZJisnDV fnubnwaGIV519ctIMFnB0GnWyvKb8d+HD53hjctvoI2Ls082tn9NdzVVOYAboXBC eBnnyRQ1CTi5DQk/9eVhMIQphlW8ysvx+jM4IbPwNsL8tNEfvVWT9qThLUCSyxFg BkbdHRsTgSieWyy+lOlC4fvypAZBU40RXVUoaSOUKF6I7QZQ1rxJovAbtNHi81KK dol+o3jR4vo3YbQLLwNhXIQulaB6txscZORg4VCKEXntXmnIuC/80elqOS674IBS Og/pz74Ok117+okLKGlk0HkM4GAmCtQVy+yQZXeFFmKuGLNEyKcuJp4zt9Nk4WNY AhoeRD+y4BcKWjIlxKNwhYS2ZKB7yQnXL2aXtxU/Syuu8paP5DHqG8uyqE4lDpE+ SHRrtvuX7Kd3nbmryBG1DbLK7u24p3yThR/QB0AnxUyjPnqFZNuuNFB9R+jS3W1H Qh2fuCcwjDX4lBbuPzc74nCBBLGusr4Dx8uIdLLiEhemd4v2ccMmcZsnhX2+ZfCx VIOgLd9zxJQtFPSxtbLL0LvA/TzmL8dntbp8B9Gz7eJOT7yHPmlcfeMAPFD4DWt1 mMmBfooU6lywSmrPyGIPNx3n1VXQRfH0b+paLsmDBqiJfC6SDEE= =h/q1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--