From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#22017: Bug #22017 Hunting: Pinning a Guix version Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 09:34:07 +0100 Message-ID: <87blswz9fk.fsf@gnu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54743) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iaFGT-0006gE-RI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 03:35:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iaFGQ-0004zi-Pg for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 03:35:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50621) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iaFGQ-0004zA-K3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 03:35:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iaFGQ-0002sj-Gw for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 03:35:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: (zimoun's message of "Wed, 27 Nov 2019 18:06:59 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: zimoun Cc: 22017@debbugs.gnu.org Hello! zimoun skribis: > You wrote: > > git clone =E2=80=A6/guix.git my-pinned-guix > (cd my-pinned-guix; git checkout deadbeef) > guix package -L my-pinned-guix --manifest=3Dmy-manifest.scm > > > which is now possible with > > guix pull --commit=3Ddeadbeef > guix package -m my-manifest.scm > > Moreover, "guix time-machine" also handles such use case. If I understand= well. Yes, pinning is definitely implemented, and much more nicely than what I was suggesting back in 2015! > Recently, a lot of new features have been discussed on guix-devel. > This one has not been raised: add local tags to ease the navigation > through different versions of Guix. It is not clear to me if it should > be under "guix pull", e.g., "guix pull --tag=3Dadd foo" or another > command "guix tag add foo". > > Because it is an really old bug, I am not sure that this whishlist > will efficiently work as a reminder, so I am inclined to close it or > maybe change the title or raise this very tagging feature to > guix-devel. Yes, I think we should close this issue and create a new one about tagging Guix revisions/channel instances. Thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99.