From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56083)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1igbgJ-0003pI-EC
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 16:44:04 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1igbgI-000565-Gb
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 16:44:03 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59585)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1igbgI-00055t-DY
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 16:44:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1igbgI-0001OL-CA
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 16:44:02 -0500
Subject: [bug#38546] [PATCH 1/3] gnu: julia: Set to JULIA_LOAD_PATH and
 JULIA_DEPOT_PATH variables.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.38546.B38546.15764462055298@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
References: <87v9qpvbyr.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
 <87tv69vbt6.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2019 22:43:16 +0100
In-Reply-To: <87tv69vbt6.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
 ("=?UTF-8?Q?Nicol=C3=B2?= Balzarotti"'s message of "Thu, 10 Oct 2019
 17:49:15 +0200")
Message-ID: <87bls9s1sb.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Nicol=C3=B2?= Balzarotti <anothersms@gmail.com>
Cc: Guix Patches <38546@debbugs.gnu.org>

Nicol=C3=B2 Balzarotti <anothersms@gmail.com> skribis:

>  gnu/packages/julia.scm | 146 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)

Please make sure to add a commit log listing all the entities changed.

Apparently there was some reindentation that makes this patch looks big
and makes the actual changes harder to spot.  Could you resubmit it
without the reindentation?

>      (native-search-paths
>       (list (search-path-specification
>              (variable "JULIA_LOAD_PATH")
> -            (files (list "share/julia/packages/")))))
> +            (files (list "share/julia/packages/"
> +                         "share/julia/stdlib/v1.1/")))

Why is this extra entry needed?  Doesn=E2=80=99t Julia find its own standard
library by default, even if JULIA_LOAD_PATH is unset?

> +           (search-path-specification
> +            (variable "JULIA_DEPOT_PATH")
> +            (files (list "share/julia/")))))

What=E2=80=99s JULIA_DEPOT_PATH supposed to point to again?  =E2=80=98share=
/julia=E2=80=99 seems
to be very much a catch-all thing.  :-)

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.