From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brett Gilio Subject: bug#33772: StumpWM broken commands? Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 19:58:53 -0600 Message-ID: <87blryjxgi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <878t0pqol1.fsf@dustycloud.org> <8736qvhym3.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1k67uz1.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87o99iwmuo.fsf@gmail.com> <87d0px7hv8.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87sgyty3ka.fsf@dustycloud.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41001) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ijZTT-0004dm-JW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 20:59:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ijZTS-0000Pf-E5 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 20:59:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45888) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ijZTS-0000PN-9n for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 20:59:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ijZTS-0002jl-96 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 20:59:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: (Pierre Langlois's message of "Wed, 19 Dec 2018 14:56:11 +0000") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Pierre Langlois Cc: Alex Kost , 33772-done@debbugs.gnu.org, evan.straw99@gmail.com Pierre Langlois writes: > Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > >> Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: >> >>> Pierre Langlois writes: >>> >>>> Alex Kost writes: >>>> >>>>> I have built stumpwm from the latest commit (which is one commit after >>>>> 18.11 release) and tried it on GuixSD and on ArchLinux. Works for me >>>>> on both systems, so it's probably not an upstream bug. >>>> >>>> Hi Alex, >>>> >>>> I was investigating just now and thought I'd try that one commit that >>>> was pushed after the release. The description doesn't sound like it >>>> would fix the problem but it was easy to try that. But it looks like it >>>> does fix the problem! >>>> >>>> Can you confirm the attached patch works for you? >>>> >>> I haven't tried it yet but it makes a lot of sense that this would fix >>> it. Both gnew and eval interactively pull up a request for a line of >>> input. >> >> I applied your patch to my machine and it fixed it... thank you! I >> pushed the patch upstream to guix master. > > Awesome, thanks! > Pierre > > > > > Hey everybody, Evan Straw and I removed this patch in 9beec2173f9243456b6aca470acd926d0dcf9b45 with an upgrade to StumpWM 19.11 which fixes this issue. As such I am closing this bug. Let me know if 19.11 is working for you all, though! -- Brett M. Gilio GNU Guix, Contributor | GNU Project, Webmaster [DFC0 C7F7 9EE6 0CA7 AE55 5E19 6722 43C4 A03F 0EEE]