From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: Strange behavior around guix package --show
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 23:32:13 +0100
Message-ID: <87blrpo36a.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <CACy6W0B3W1PonJrURc6RGOxvvcwTOyhCfm82QwgbouqJMeK3iQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <87eewxq3lh.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <CACy6W0C1B+_uOjMHhwdSJGqE+nZFsxYAfiEdybfCF=pk89YGXA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACy6W0CvfEEsWHKxo_evf-r3VoJtxLsUxz8FX3ynTE8wvfview@mail.gmail.com>
 <87blrpyd7m.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42383)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1im3aJ-0004Vh-Aa
 for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 17:32:24 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1im3aI-0005So-Be
 for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 17:32:23 -0500
Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21143)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1im3aI-0005RU-3W
 for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 17:32:22 -0500
In-reply-to: <87blrpyd7m.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
List-Id: <help-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-guix>,
 <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:help-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-guix>,
 <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Help-Guix" <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: help-guix@gnu.org, Jacob MacDonald <jaccarmac@gmail.com>


Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> writes:

> Hmm... I'm experiencing a similar issue on 83870c3.

I can reproduce this.

-- 
Ricardo