From: Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net>
To: Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e@gmail.com>,
Jack Hill <jackhill@jackhill.us>
Cc: 41695-done@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#41695: [PATCH] Update Go to v1.14.4
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:55:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bll66qqu.fsf@cbaines.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2006062144370.5735@marsh.hcoop.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2084 bytes --]
Jack Hill <jackhill@jackhill.us> writes:
> On Sat, 6 Jun 2020, Katherine Cox-Buday wrote:
>
>> Jack Hill <jackhill@jackhill.us> writes:
>>
>> You're welcome! Thanks for the review. I wish I had more time to
>> contribute to Guix.
>>
>> I suppose I should have qualified my statement by saying there's too
>> many dependent Go packages for me to test. I should invest in a better
>> computer :)
>
> More computing is nice, but in the meantime, I'm happy to be part of a
> community of other Guix people who can provide extra cycles when
> needed.
>
> I'd like to recognize the work Chris and Danjela are doing on Guix
> Data Service to ease patch review as well.
>
>>> Reading through the Go release notes [1], the following change to the
>>> net/url package caught my eye:
>>>
>>>> When parsing of a URL fails (for example by Parse or
>>>> ParseRequestURI), the resulting Error message will now quote the
>>>> unparsable URL. This provides clearer structure and consistency with
>>>> other parsing errors.
>>>
>>> I think this could be the cause of the docker test failure. Should we
>>> patch docker or perhaps try to update it?
>>
>> Spot on! I've updated docker and docker-cli. hyperledger-fabric depends
>> on docker-cli and also continues to build. I've attached a patch which
>> should supersede the prior patch. It updates go, docker, and docker-cli
>> atomically.
>
> I'm happy to confirm that the revised path fixes the docker problem
> here as well.
>
> […]
>
>>> I am curious, why switch to using git-fetch?
>>
>> `guix lint` now complains about downloading tarballs. I have also
>> recently seen some chatter on the mailing list about preferring this.
>
> Right, I remember that thread, thanks!
>
> Hopefully a more experienced reviewer/committer will confirm that
> everything looks good and push soon.
Thanks for the patch Katherine, and thanks to doing some review
Jack. I've had a look now, and pushed (with a small commit message
changes): 6e9f8826087fbd824c546f6daad70f090fa1a8d7
Thanks again,
Chris
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 962 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-26 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-03 23:36 [bug#41695] [PATCH] Update Go to v1.14.4 Katherine Cox-Buday
2020-06-05 21:07 ` Jack Hill
2020-06-06 19:13 ` Katherine Cox-Buday
2020-06-07 2:13 ` Jack Hill
2020-06-26 10:55 ` Christopher Baines [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bll66qqu.fsf@cbaines.net \
--to=mail@cbaines.net \
--cc=41695-done@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=cox.katherine.e@gmail.com \
--cc=jackhill@jackhill.us \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.