From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id OAh1GPNrYGJeTwAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 22:24:19 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id aL9qGPNrYGLnOQAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 22:24:19 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29DB43D462 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 22:24:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40370 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nhGs6-0006Mo-7k for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 16:24:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45414) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nhGID-0006ay-VG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 15:47:14 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53651) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nhGI2-0008N7-AR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 15:47:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nhGI2-0001rB-6W for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 15:47:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#54941: No such file or directory when running a binary Resent-From: Haider Mirza Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 19:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54941 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Bengt Richter , Maxime Devos Received: via spool by 54941-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54941.16504839897079 (code B ref 54941); Wed, 20 Apr 2022 19:47:02 +0000 Received: (at 54941) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Apr 2022 19:46:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47548 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nhGHU-0001q7-UE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 15:46:29 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f43.google.com ([209.85.221.43]:33729) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nhGHT-0001pv-D9 for 54941@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 15:46:27 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f43.google.com with SMTP id x18so3720353wrc.0 for <54941@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 12:46:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=tAWeyBjt7wF6D87RglKO1igxVkoYEs+TDzGuWtkFu10=; b=JcNhibDi4dahPayS4hqKMvb63a0m4ZRsgS/0EJe3iHjmKeAODexVdg2hoNZx9H6rtA YjWSH/onQxBpej1UaCg71+AwG3R+UWM/FR5+3eBFW/wdvBrUVBMcHFz0dkJ/QUEXV6bB IcBV9Dq93mF9kYonCuBy7e8gOG5PF7dPHHvUZCybLrBWhqeUP3Aa401M/O/twYSeBnoe P/GiXrvU8S0V479NRq9NfkMaElJ4FzA7rflyUGR/0I18wzjRdGDc+ZRFbHN7VzaWE+b0 K7way8EQBUQwTdmYMZV5C12HcNsYeo3wQvWYRqtBwRRmWQxbsxN8WtSd9jr2rvGy4/sN 9QBg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=tAWeyBjt7wF6D87RglKO1igxVkoYEs+TDzGuWtkFu10=; b=3HykSfzJa2yhWWtjbpNON6GY5v521Kzq9rRDQLifM+GkGMX0+6nM3S0KzDJeLtKdr0 SugGE8QsCUgr2K52V/m9+aNKTftl0qQkKlMA5ImlKjPg5MYUIxjNVV0y0frtD/BaTm+L xizq8+wRTF6vDz5ZvgZ12CGhu67wfpc/gAfz1RQSyd3v1gcUzeHn3OfDTamuoFkrNYUg dhZwe//ywyfUS3vid56uV02NX6jMsDiGRvt8Nu7rHFOQWOLi+AdHxICIkQL0qmR/aSUi kg+3u3tKvio/+nthPT1m+5YEjWTw4+59Gp8flRSD0g059aBNwFsdv5M4gqc6h8KXBcIs zRpA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532bfety9UQFkEcwJ6scJm2sODPPvnDZ5dW/hODtA5r4C1sMMVie IdObddHAJgO7XK/5h+WT0lbt8r4P+nTkeiM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzuv9cCESzKanRthBPXd41HBQUXk+P64iFRIr1GRYTksTXYbj2DBFrtd+XFZFi4JCNqiA0bYw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4cc8:0:b0:207:b601:3137 with SMTP id c8-20020a5d4cc8000000b00207b6013137mr16595270wrt.652.1650483981278; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 12:46:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps (cpc1-king12-2-0-cust422.19-1.cable.virginm.net. [92.239.105.167]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z6-20020a056000110600b00207aa9eec98sm563659wrw.30.2022.04.20.12.46.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 20 Apr 2022 12:46:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Haider Mirza In-Reply-To: <20220416233249.GA2485@LionPure> References: <87h76v1xs4.fsf@gmail.com> <2baf3596a45611a7c10b64a698fb7ad4b09c4d95.camel@telenet.be> <20220416233249.GA2485@LionPure> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.35 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/27.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 20:46:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87bkwvzgg3.fsf@smtp.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 54941@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1650486259; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=tAWeyBjt7wF6D87RglKO1igxVkoYEs+TDzGuWtkFu10=; b=e1f4HeTrVkUSDq6J8t8W9hZ3pCveA7GssI7MdJNCG7nuCptKX+tEWXvpRzUiyh7G4pvuLy DbWbivsuh5grxu7b4L3MmLw8VLYcquSeOVhCfaHv/zAPYVgCcb1/Vp4DHbzIGpYnkL4cWW Jlf3jssrxRWQOTb4eQ6GRNinvBT4zUb03b/lsfMZi4IPfS+XswgHy2AJUbwBf8lCn5w0dY zgzVG5VVF1PNv5Y0lMa+ZO3Vx/kIv8meyt/EhW/EhfpAa+EHZXgxskG+eW8YBYmDF0pV8y DCmLXsVXTik6UvAAV6i77X02LajnB0xuiNe5PgnU2t2BkGqBdEd2InOh0g9PLg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1650486259; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=FHpTe47sSsiUpB9D+xu7iIylZmFL6qCzZVm8GfBC7WdMxm7OcIckwKaHHVA0ITzQ4OFMJf 20yDO09o4BltpW9aevewbCYDuxEIKaSVV2KQkNAR26TrxwTuOUOUDhvoXSagVERgg+MLHz fhW+GP9ZOr/b11Y0g0k7HHW1Mra/qC7anmQ7lJ4cUdB7AUvUaFDNas0wZkwxTsaOBk1W75 nYVRVfhXkH7MyyOkdLknY+p2hNx+NS3Klq5mPX17faa5EjBK75PGOvbov/4eChk7SWDCjE zjI5wna706Lcm1wSuQ4vGbWbFU/GMRKcs4QptrCLlBEKwvYN327p4T3qXTIJxQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=JcNhibDi; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 4.36 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=JcNhibDi; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 29DB43D462 X-Spam-Score: 4.36 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: FIPDfKHH3mIT --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > (This is not to accuse you Haider, who I don't know, of probing Maxime > -- but consider the seemingly casual example you are setting for noobs > in suggesting running an unknown (to others) binary). Sorry about that, usually Github Repositories ask for some way to reproduce a bug so they can try and debug it. I had expected him to have ran the binary in a VM. But like you said it might not be apparent to the less experienced.=20 > The con starts off as many that target individuals do > nowadays: With a text message. In this case it's not a > phishing attempt, it's an attempt to ascertain whether the > person receiving the message is susceptible to further > manipulation. Looking back, that really did seem quite manipulative, worse with the repository not even with a license. Thanks for spotting this out and making me realize my mistake. All the best, Haider. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJFBAEBCAAvFiEEAjeuCmF0doTqepNfLFLbI14Ps2wFAmJgYwIRHHg3YW5kN0Bn bWFpbC5jb20ACgkQLFLbI14Ps2xHFQ//W2D6mQ03bKNLFxegKffhCy8Cj4SqenJF aV6/rcoSQvzTX177SWo5zU2M+Ge1pDJ28VuZLCNDiaVTnRwZhnk1NqRgFSQ0iYNX FNOKt1KmUXuuP09ka0NOea92tA8IV+kcP7PI4B57NE3AKsas2lO/y4GDE3vO8iHC VMzvqUaCujeI2IS9Tl1uGlgP38esnb2gDI5GeF2cSNlHIQ+t8x+VcqyhS4auI4iW Kn3BAdaJlgHdUj8Z0cUePjJugJNTFqKG6xr95MMZkm4HuDpPP4P5LdmQ/38ZsQT4 EK7kmI48+Kd8FeQu/T0o9IwixcuE3PqcBw3+DMaAH7+nM8+xnPwPBV4YzUThDhwF 5guCXt0Xu/56ur+WUOgOiRv9hqseckqJ6WFPIQPheam1kcYIwEDZm+MMBdiZ9AiD KbSiMImqtu0gYKZ89KkhO3WirlCWaFeeoA2tZM9s/TG7Hzdjpf7GVtwulFHGD/rc fr4Q3wasxHXsccd3VD4RpP3pAxt7C8wsaW4PFZ2sZzW6Xz32QwgX9VPvJuTpW8MN 7ttPwXxzHxN9e9npF2XyfM5pJ9NndjTCLYBfMFf5jBPlj+6ZPL5viANZ4RYnsQwp 13pZ8tJZbmoszbZhzeA4SzGKeFDUx5jrKB+H0T8tQrQG8SOB84J66lFSEOvvHGip pCkf4odvDKo= =TCR4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--