From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id KMikKXPB2mME/AAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 20:45:55 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0IqAKXPB2mPMTAAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 20:45:55 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55858284E3 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 20:45:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNJ2q-0005JG-LW; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 14:45:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNJ2o-0005IJ-5S; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 14:45:22 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNJ2l-0003iR-Vb; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 14:45:21 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=KjLfyxU9jmOub aSUr1FN9kQ9e/pObeZ6WaChlPsJnAE=; h=in-reply-to:date:subject:cc:to: from:references; d=tobias.gr; b=hWBEvwgrkcVycK/yyfurGqNq96NyDN1qgNqTT4 UknjjAd16x3YfO0QlUeOuwZFXzuL9WKf6EUHml5DtK/PAOqCIWo3OIDNchiOfxESSKq1V2 Zoz4xwVjHcNlV6PpuALlgKRFIVJn2DBwFBhVkHUOYbmpJmy3WaT+7p+KnPcPU5DExSj4pM /bweM66XLjK0tUxe+/4P6A0bX8a1QaYEdDnvdz/xzNpClngJIKxwb9t3Of7IsxnqA/Tng9 KkTJWo3cJ8p9GO5mnWI2/bm1CsTLI/Z26Jffdvre+NRJ/9m/ufr9YQxMeDAljLNLB5zSCu sFKtdOwSo1ypLUWOO158oH9w== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 97b74978 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Wed, 1 Feb 2023 19:45:14 +0000 (UTC) References: <87fsbpnzil.fsf@nckx> From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: Ekaitz Zarraga Cc: Christian Gelinek , help-guix@gnu.org Subject: Disabling unprivileged BPF by default in our kernels Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 20:43:42 +0100 In-reply-to: BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; Message-ID: <87bkmdnp69.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1675280755; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=B8m39OSIY7+CE4jfiJHv9RMDzj+m1joOKrzNzxJgQ2F7L26VFFdRUJmqK1WK8boiEp2qpj 4cUPdz7hrTFSYubIgPIgQ0u+8NI85zCvgQNXnLtsQL5FyWJdoHhWbl2mkaqZAjvN/27iOb /vT9PdODtrnmZW0NM2dddCAbTVr88BDM+ZZeCfiMD44mY2dIz7h/1TMv+i1VTCTnXny6/M l2O27xehXF1eNUlsK7+bN8Tln6dqEzgA6ix9dTDQ3QBv8+CqtU88TzECFFnpiOt296zEWX WqVgNVzSjFFt2PXFocSUdHU7fUb0C2vYG9j1g1xLiKCartSA75BEU/+2HvYh8g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=tobias.gr header.s=2018 header.b=hWBEvwgr; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=tobias.gr ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1675280755; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=KjLfyxU9jmOubaSUr1FN9kQ9e/pObeZ6WaChlPsJnAE=; b=uwIjgwceOJGahYxzcvhryFW+kW5zKZeGAEZvh5+6yqPYQTB/maSWPqPjv+8JkODfW6J86P Xamcjlx9YS2QSVOyD2wBe6+qh6m/aHVXI2kqo1o7Q0dew2Jwh7uw3Q9Hu1f0PnOQ5h74hi XJsjVxW4frT4Ehh/NT2KGD44egHLvAPC8seAOGW9UR2aLR4ETu6uEfbFtmJTP0SrmRD9En Zfj5DVLT+igxU1tP6MWX6lW9AUDvpf/b6UGN6kQtO4WOGVurNoWTwaTq9K4OB+FicWomUo mV1+myPCIZRdnAiR+U/4NQV8HlDbyKiJMMyfEIadmh9JlLkvPRpGW7fhFp8V7Q== Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=tobias.gr header.s=2018 header.b=hWBEvwgr; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=tobias.gr X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.55 X-Spam-Score: -6.55 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 55858284E3 X-TUID: hsKpjfZBFeZE --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ekaitz Zarraga =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > What does Debian's kconfig list for=20 > CONFIG_BPF_UNPRIV_DEFAULT_OFF? I've always had this option set to Y in my own kernels, and it has=20 never so much as inconvenienced me. However, I'm not a BPF power=20 user. Does anyone know any serious and concrete drawbacks to setting=20 this option in all Guix kernels, to increase default security &=20 better align with other major distros? Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCY9rBzw0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15BeIBAKPpvY+lOPqMpDrvGUtvcq+PB4hCIJUiibDwSO5U t8DNAQDulhBEeK8GfXYKhQOgN6d8+2nimmqsbFiXX5bHrUccBw== =AqCV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--