From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id cISdCU5nMWTXsAAASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 15:08:30 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id CEKdCU5nMWSK+wAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 15:08:30 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E01EADB69 for ; Sat, 8 Apr 2023 15:08:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pl8Ii-0006ft-IM; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 09:08:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pl8If-0006fU-JL for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 09:08:14 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pl8IU-00072T-HF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 09:08:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pl8IU-0000SH-9Y for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 09:08:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#62570] [PATCH 3/6] gnu: texlive-latex-bigfoot: Replace with texlive-bigfoot. Resent-From: Nicolas Goaziou Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2023 13:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62570 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Simon Tournier Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , Timothy Sample , Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 62570@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 62570-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62570.16809592481707 (code B ref 62570); Sat, 08 Apr 2023 13:08:02 +0000 Received: (at 62570) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Apr 2023 13:07:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57998 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pl8Hw-0000RS-FO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 09:07:28 -0400 Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.231]:49163) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pl8Hu-0000RF-1x for 62570@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2023 09:07:26 -0400 Received: (Authenticated sender: admin@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B87FB100003; Sat, 8 Apr 2023 13:07:18 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Goaziou References: <20230331153226.607420-1-mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <20230331153226.607420-3-mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87o7nzk5a7.fsf@gmail.com> <878rf3mv13.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <867cum7m3x.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2023 15:07:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: <867cum7m3x.fsf@gmail.com> (Simon Tournier's message of "Sat, 08 Apr 2023 11:35:14 +0200") Message-ID: <87bkjyjzen.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1680959310; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=mrU9LZ1y6VXxXhM+FXKtg0fW3oIo+wr3yj5fBfCIvaB7rFPz/cHVFi9oRLQuBFzBCIHDnj xE+YEP/v6gD1S5Zr3Zdnt5G3L3684Ve44ZhO3rPnOv2FMfWLvWnANxgItHEsOpsbUp3PI2 TGezPSbuXDzYBHt7WbKgcKQXMCYgH8zrGAPpNPRRSXb4fx9+hqPErJJlQwUS6oPQ4Qcj47 3WfJtc0seLoC1F0Ah82T8QnC2TPWGQN/VnIan99LzOoQvD0PaxQuZ31jQD97rmotZ8Bcpu l/y8hKuDY+naQ6wRdAdqpiz99qz3XGM8HmqapBdnMFlY/qwiceA7bIR4juAs3g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1680959310; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=NF/ig59/O6dXLrYKM3PZi3J2X7Bazi1+5pFgmZP7+TU=; b=FSzrjizDrjU1mYFkrdyZutUx6ArEL6zDqfRefD2QVmuXEoq7xA7m7ozEnP3d3sJUPEr/r/ rP0z3n1wn/IHxspXCZ8TUd3xIAsHgZzYwCdr5Rdg3J/aaO+dvAEN6OqpKvDP+TfCPHKLgJ iXjNSxaKxZGuSR5gTLErEaZLi+L+2DkXr0HfeAjDsWep1Fsm6JF8WS3wgM0J/HWHEw1ERh mAxe2dmErMVng/zoS0S6LAfavVcayoOT95O0R22iTSN9wWlhUCkQf2l7USyLL3hxKx6MdS 5UROgCI6K+ANqX+LutBjYdcA436fGQjBtAEq25hOyW8QEehFmuR+SALfEEtfTg== X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.82 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Spam-Score: -1.82 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E01EADB69 X-TUID: AbGB+0lT44JF Hello, Simon Tournier writes: > On Fri, 07 Apr 2023 at 20:01, Nicolas Goaziou wr= ote: > >> Unfortunately, there are other old TeXLive packages in this very same >> sad situation. > > Well, one after the other, they will be converted. :-) Sure thing. However, correcting myself, as my words were too strong in this particular case, current "texlive-latex-bigfoot" is not exactly "broken". Running "./pre-inst-env guix build texlive-latex-bigfoot" generates the following layout: /gnu/store/848cbycs3y9gqbc0c6giag1m7a53x32r-texlive-latex-bigfoot-59745 =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 share =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 texmf-dist =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 tex =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 latex =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 bigfoot =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 bigfoot.drv =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 bigfoot.sty =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 perpage.drv =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 perpage.sty =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 suffix.drv =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94=80 suffix.sty 6 directories, 6 files So, ".sty" files are indeed properly installed. There is no documentation, though. Also, source files are not kept in the store. There are two approaches going on here. `simple-texlive-package' tries to provide a tessellation of the full texlive, i.e., if you install (assuming they are defined in Guix) every standalone texlive package, you will get the exact full texlive distribution, whereas `texlive-ref' + `texlive-build-system' tries to generate a minimal (a bit too minimal considering missing documentation) working system. I think the old way is error prone. So, do we (not only the two of us, obviously) agree on the `simple-texlive-package' approach? If so, what should we do about "source"? Regards, --=20 Nicolas Goaziou