From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id KNK6LFKNdGQpLgAASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 29 May 2023 13:32:34 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id OD2MK1KNdGShMAEAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 29 May 2023 13:32:34 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B47813088 for ; Mon, 29 May 2023 13:32:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q3b6n-00070r-8K; Mon, 29 May 2023 07:32:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q3b6Y-00070N-Ud for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2023 07:32:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q3b6Y-0008Ck-Ml for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2023 07:32:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q3b6Y-000495-Bn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2023 07:32:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#48656] [PATCH] gnu: lz4: Add a patch for CVE-2021-3520. Resent-From: Jelle Licht Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 11:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48656 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Leo Famulari Cc: 48656@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 48656-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48656.168535987715863 (code B ref 48656); Mon, 29 May 2023 11:32:02 +0000 Received: (at 48656) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 May 2023 11:31:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57240 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q3b5p-00047n-2S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2023 07:31:17 -0400 Received: from mail1.fsfe.org ([217.69.89.151]:50322) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q3b5m-00047c-JA for 48656@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2023 07:31:15 -0400 From: Jelle Licht DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fsfe.org; s=2021100501; t=1685359873; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9VovPzR7e2O1OSHSvWvI9ZahZcliQl/9xuqX//tTfgk=; b=FwzvLXii2MCvrpLl33Q81HcSpCI9NlwLavYSJ2wd1eFQ1nTLsmkyW16ak7Jk0PWtGfSZRE xpM3i5+rWqqXyNpI66adIJAaG3x32Yj1EzghvFxkPaYgQLdW7Av+3QeK+Zl0ngvEXQTK7A AQMB3eagWrXDXKqUbCajm4aTG+khjdw= In-Reply-To: (Leo Famulari's message of "Tue, 25 May 2021 17:51:24 -0400") References: <20210525202407.383e1713@perso.pw> Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 13:31:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87bki3nzlr.fsf@fsfe.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1685359954; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=tMHTbclHH6ZqClcoOCmwtTRSPSywAM35/yDgWhsB74znJ+hRGHZZqz0CrqouRsLb4fvcCn yKepjAC5GIP3ixFPYASojlbZ2JUkZenWggmWdNAKBfvLmuGqxz5z2L3v/7rbn7FsxZstCB tHJUI9jhmHbLOr5WsKC8zWPV9b8nszRIoiJRdQLmSIs/dqygTMPURHOswcL+xbDe2Sjswl 3jZRpo+R7Zc7+4AJWE5FdJM4aIR69p5lYNLmKW5Yi3cbXyCWPk9sV2/pgrxehsJd+puwXJ lbbjY6E/rNn0LUid0PpdfQjhAMBhwBgecO/UJRZ7lwD3sV1yVNTubFEonXk4uQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=fsfe.org header.s=2021100501 header.b=FwzvLXii; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=fsfe.org (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1685359954; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=9VovPzR7e2O1OSHSvWvI9ZahZcliQl/9xuqX//tTfgk=; b=WqD8Z4kKCNfbneYibqQD1vS6oKeXOJ+JdOUtlE0anVsasCx0RMWrLVj9UaXhXwdJnO4Kbn Cp5eizi+0907q0g/295klHdWxgDlaSsr5jjh1gs8+jnQCHOaUdjinuqD0Ud+QBwxDignqS H+6hNf2pge6C01IkH/Dgb2K1bhMEc0xWVfZaJ4K3M7dy2u1tD01RWDlf1j3b4fNj1QNdOH aSDLEkf2DoXFnqIF5XnmdUPpNFoYaEjo3nu8j/uDkXlOmqCGVFO15k46sS8CPqOWMM4E73 GsbGwya0tjyvGx9vYkNxMl6nRhNsTkQHxMdeCu2rf6N/K+YehFm9OQHinypjTg== X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -0.81 X-Spam-Score: -0.81 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 6B47813088 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=fsfe.org header.s=2021100501 header.b=FwzvLXii; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=fsfe.org (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-TUID: FI9hGTXvQZ5K Leo Famulari writes: > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 03:07:05PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: >> Is there any discussion about this upstream? Why isn't it included in >> lz4 yet? > > I found approval from the lz4 maintainers: > > https://github.com/lz4/lz4/pull/972#issuecomment-830192743 > https://github.com/lz4/lz4/pull/972#issuecomment-799719118 It seems there's some uncertainty w.r.t. the validity of the CVE [0], but since then a release has been made that pulls the changes discussed in issue 972 into lz4 release 1.9.4.