From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id CAnlCYFRM2fRNgEAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 13:00:49 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id CAnlCYFRM2fRNgEAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:00:49 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=Cp6CmPVD; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1731416449; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=uVrgFASLHfgJ3Mj/x/ov979WnLeYNTMGPS8KUZ4xeV/T1aParSvX5IPkjCDxQH4Xoil8LT EUf9JmeUmWj6jwFdPaYudir1xzmrj54zSiXrvYP/zbrCoOkHzGAnHFjZAgoQgvxi2D1QZV BiZ6p0zOP9r6yKCUP0W4xrjeLTQj3wzPkWLJd6tkkB3mR03EvkQJt4HOTv+yHxzPE3Bumw /lMSihoyPy89NJJVHwUhWGqcKe9yeqbzYfSTxBWGn1jJKuW1Q8TtFUo45oDQaVQ2BLc5KX Hd6eeBBYEn8PHRZsHN4D01lS+hzwtWxRXKEz3ztiG2uClpuJlNZXP/lXpL9TgA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=Cp6CmPVD; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1731416449; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=T6rNOfy7XoIGluZyI2myytY2d3p5njOtZjL9lEZ97Zk=; b=IRXBX9EYsnVxBRDyLnL5qcsUI5DCX7PQlgQeYBIR9rU9SWI4llz6H+4nJC8mCVz6gKgr3x 0NlhWW+Yxl4NAYw/R9mYquA3Mwb0LaZWBjK4SKe7WtCNyEdQYLv8OwGOj+Y2NxUkapbMwF RU/jK46VM10R24NnxQ7JT/m3IQkgHMrExysjRGJvHnP0dkCZs0jt9x3lr5+Nh3lj2qQcWj frS9ep9FDLHLOyF3OTJ1QNt006YZe6ZsU0qYJX2pDPoIo9+fm5BcUvdbtfUYGcA9NIeoOe 4AzUnm2TaeastQlrqB5CGY6VUDBwjkt2ay2VOhKgV3Zgizb5qIFIK/1Ui7rEQQ== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B79A575FD6 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:00:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tAqUx-0004Ig-SR; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 07:59:59 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tAqUu-0004I5-0C for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 07:59:56 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x633.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::633]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tAqUs-0002F5-1J; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 07:59:55 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-x633.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20caccadbeeso60219915ad.2; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 04:59:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1731416390; x=1732021190; darn=gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=T6rNOfy7XoIGluZyI2myytY2d3p5njOtZjL9lEZ97Zk=; b=Cp6CmPVDQQKaYla0KQt22u9szwg8BhlBPq1Wgw65zOtQ5hvbqFuPilC3mVn4Uhu0pf UDZFcZ60af0YYScXkjRfiUtjzeTOMAaD1BI8ivVFHKvhhWC/wQWnDIsXsCy1Qsg6XfXm zUoqixOJa4ffq3DL+Tz4++IUtFRAZJzAw9LaCmRSx0S8qJFlHmLOZPCNg7ENmPXUhjZe HH2lxG1S4Xxe2UQ3XWkWDBeib6tocJ/zfWbaBPF/GHLFG+DrRCE4QSMb5TY0Mu3hE9Iu pjfT3v7NeFPou2dY6tP3w08b09sFAkqCYCHZlmAN+ZveST0XecPyDQm51wqVHm4o6xD3 FSDA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1731416390; x=1732021190; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=T6rNOfy7XoIGluZyI2myytY2d3p5njOtZjL9lEZ97Zk=; b=ZKSeU1wW1DXQRaAPobi6BtU+ZsAK9k4D5Ddq51CMDf9kWGFxHwxd+2vpR12kqbfHgY S/eI95idE55NkWgz7RfO0hnb5SnYvZyq2R+Ubzs3q85zpeE3UisMfLTK/0hyAZj3N0U4 zxAlXcvskELLib/gp8o+JdQRFfoDGVsh/IYwiZYkEq8SyH4AfacG4ml9+U2g7FFfbveY f03tZOlVMmHA4u/1u8CjS96/nG9olE3XoSbJWlKiDfgv631s7PVDvfEMz3nHYKGic6Hu x3QYR4BBaC+/7BAiz4Zwk1CJid5RMq1xkIHaVGH7p7ZiVrTum8ydKZI3GS3wDpNoXr+D Zs4g== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVHIqHKpT22drn577j+3ZLEu7v2uJutC7/x++9TNVq809PImI4hKktQKmtzHxYnQT6nR0HaDzu6IT8i@gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw8qCSEzUAbBc9SPyMjr/LqFw+ltDECr9ruqJO3fTG/V8zw70ln Bxhei+Le3Zqyjiu3et4gVd5ezYKkWEIZibAvZQL5ptQz+478nOiwW6V/kqyI X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGcYXSuBi6TLXzP2MFXBKsENZ4VrVS8hm8tMqiSPEKVXT9E4Jpdck3J96UNMgZk6RVRp/cchA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:234a:b0:20c:80d9:9982 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-211835b7bc7mr230712045ad.47.1731416390369; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 04:59:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from terra ([2405:6586:be0:0:c8ff:1707:9b9:af89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-21177e6c8ffsm93521485ad.256.2024.11.12.04.59.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 12 Nov 2024 04:59:49 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Leo Famulari Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 67535-done@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Does anyone use i686-linux? [was Re: bug#67535: ci.guix.gnu.org 'Cannot allocate memory' while building for i686-linux] In-Reply-To: (Leo Famulari's message of "Sun, 10 Nov 2024 23:51:05 -0500") References: <87h6bpdeia.fsf@gnu.org> <87h68fwbda.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 21:59:42 +0900 Message-ID: <87bjyk38w1.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::633; envelope-from=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com; helo=mail-pl1-x633.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.36 X-Spam-Score: -5.36 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: B79A575FD6 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-TUID: c50COuwSd9aJ Hi, Leo Famulari writes: > On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 08:56:33PM +0900, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >> I was about to write this; thanks for be6g faster :-). I believe the >> unpacking should now be fine even for i686, Leo? > > Yes, it's working now! Fantastic! Great. That said, I wouldn't be against stopping building i686 packages on our build farm. Nobody has shown much interested in fixing the broken ones or hunting down test failures... it seems better to focus our energy elsewhere and clear the view in my opinion (such as old bugs on our bug tracker that lingers on) So I'd be of the opinion to: 1) Stop building i686 packages 2) Otherwise preserve the architecture in Guix source so that someone can at least build from source and hack on it if they wish, e.g. to test cross-building packages. -- Thanks, Maxim