From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id UIUuAQzUa2f4EAEAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 25 Dec 2024 09:44:44 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id UIUuAQzUa2f4EAEAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 25 Dec 2024 10:44:44 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=ditigal.xyz header.s=20240917 header.b=TZm6gfWV; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=ditigal.xyz ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1735119883; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=fWaE/xCzeoO/ZitAxrNbR/XxdF9v8REJFEK2pYBUUXg=; b=k+1YQQ5YTgG0dJiymUka11VilDqCVvCpg78bCNugkL3sJ1fPAPMCs2RDKXF78oSotcy2zS 8XXGps/zD4VSNDRlYPen9gyj+LsJynV+KFnvwI/VuNzVawp1dzRh/APGN+2t21lp2NrJ8n 2pNgc0wVadmFLxhGoA1zP8q0nTzvh1+bUh9rpcgITj5HxRbibCzENNKoi4zMdTcPLELk7u 1hIzYmTDBV/4ZETIV1BaEcQ+jdfWAyApmABXeL8dmcyvX5G+o5Is9GGOtcrxvZMg7ImyNx GevKD1fCFYJ3e/HRaBa9rGrD9u3kCGHcJTVuOPspVC1acoD4ROiRTR8O9tJSZg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=ditigal.xyz header.s=20240917 header.b=TZm6gfWV; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=ditigal.xyz ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1735119883; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=acOoTeoD/p1xlf4tivFDMM3fK8PXoLXW4NWKWOiCtV1OTQsBgeNKFmXUKwLsBaHYOHs8nM kJ4QqfJRdR8VUmXnW79E3tnGkRhLjndWpNbriHulOh3RRXztQp32/izMo1zu1XG/9dQ6SV uKXv3zTePBwS6P2NO2UZVcd3WeqTUvSY36cHwOF/LyiJiJ5Whlfivd/spTu+C/NIiC1pl8 qCbHMwKv3zOpHknMZX8uARX+JIOVRBI0RFydU335cWUVDg6EOM42Ke4R8Z7Mjq/sRv10Qu VTxBBOJe56qJs3JGgOposFjzP9NjyYjNUr7KmjdJ+5n7eyGFGP1Lna2HwJP2xg== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8454D964B7 for ; Wed, 25 Dec 2024 10:44:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tQMki-00009E-75; Wed, 25 Dec 2024 03:28:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tQMkg-00008v-5f for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2024 03:28:22 -0500 Received: from ditigal.xyz ([2a01:4f8:1c1b:6a1c::] helo=mail.ditigal.xyz) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tQMke-0001ai-Iw for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2024 03:28:21 -0500 Received: by cerebrum (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id f714c292 (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); Wed, 25 Dec 2024 08:28:16 +0000 (UTC) From: Rutherther To: Ethan Reece Cc: help-guix@gnu.org Subject: Re: Cannot build "guix" on aarch64 In-Reply-To: <9da787df-6a02-4011-a5a2-87a032cbedb9@app.fastmail.com> References: <87ldwg4ug2.fsf@ditigal.xyz> <9da787df-6a02-4011-a5a2-87a032cbedb9@app.fastmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2024 09:28:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87bjx0majl.fsf@ditigal.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ditigal.xyz; i=@ditigal.xyz; q=dns/txt; s=20240917; t=1735115296; h=from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=fWaE/xCzeoO/ZitAxrNbR/XxdF9v8REJFEK2pYBUUXg=; b=TZm6gfWVuP5MwVqMXwHWyyr87U0dChBV+GMG27OPFdwU02QbUkkvIV0NwtqXGUk/h2wkL NjwDENBYcjcLr3tdLWfRPGVBkukDUzk2AGDKFa59YbnCKYNX+WONRU6GD6FtmUNXTZPGjgz DggUhQzBFz0JDKe+aKGGA4UeTP+QY+c= Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f8:1c1b:6a1c::; envelope-from=rutherther@ditigal.xyz; helo=mail.ditigal.xyz X-Spam_score_int: 4 X-Spam_score: 0.4 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.5, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.999, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -8.87 X-Spam-Score: -8.87 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8454D964B7 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-TUID: Rm1fG/SFsCS1 Hi Ethan, Nice to hear you got it fixed after all! > > Hi Rutherther, > > I did some more tests and found out that the `guix` package compiles successfully if I make my /tmp directory use my root BTRFS partition instead of Tmpfs. Somebody on Github[1] thinks this has to do with the 16kb Tmpfs sector sizes that Asahi Linux uses due to having a 16k page size instead of 4k that x86 machines use and also filed a report on debbugs[2]. I'm not sure why Guix worked previously, but I also noticed while testing that I couldn't compile an old (August) version of the Guix repo either so I'm guessing that an Asahi Fedora update changed the /tmp configuration and that's when the issue started. That is interesting, I don't know why sector size would matter, but I suppose it could be plausible. Note that with guix it's usually not so good to have /tmp as tmpfs in general. The thing is that guix builds there, and some builds can take up a lot of space + they are building, so even consume ram by running the processes. So it's quite easy to get out of RAM unless you have a lot of RAM. But if you were able to build previously and the size of your /tmp tmpfs did not change, I suppose that was not the issue here. Regrads, Rutherther