From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#16484: Contradictory package count Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 22:11:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87a9el13we.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20140118120030.GA7524@debian> <871u05s3j9.fsf@gnu.org> <20140123193952.GA13401@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50111) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W6o2w-0008If-Co for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 16:12:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W6o2l-0006wm-21 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 16:12:14 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49124) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W6o2k-0006wc-Vm for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 16:12:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W6o2k-0003BW-MC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 16:12:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20140123193952.GA13401@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:39:52 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: 16484-done@debbugs.gnu.org Andreas Enge skribis: > On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 04:39:06PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> The issue is that the =E2=80=9865 packages=E2=80=99 lines comes from the= build side log >> (which doesn=E2=80=99t know the distinction between propagated inputs an= d the >> rest), while the =E2=80=9851 packages=E2=80=99 line comes from =E2=80=98= guix package=E2=80=99. >>=20 >> Perhaps the log should say =E2=80=9865 items=E2=80=99, to make it clear = it=E2=80=99s not >> counting the same thing. >>=20 >> Alternately, we could also remove that line altogether. > > Maybe we could remove both lines even? But I am happy with removing only > one, then preferably the "65 packages" one, which is not coherent with > guix package -I|wc I removed the =E2=80=9Cwrong=E2=80=9D one, and kept the other. Thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99.