From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: wip-armhf branch ready for wider testing
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:10:02 +0100
Message-ID: <87a91ezg4l.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87wq544xjl.fsf@netris.org> <87r3vbadft.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20150118221223.GA19598@debian> <87bnluws8c.fsf@netris.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57656)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1YDIeL-0007sS-SJ
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:10:14 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1YDIeI-0004fC-H1
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:10:13 -0500
Received: from [2a01:474::1] (port=46621 helo=hera.aquilenet.fr)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1YDIeI-0004UI-A4
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:10:10 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87bnluws8c.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Mon, 19
	Jan 2015 13:16:51 -0500")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> skribis:

> Our armhf targets the same set of machines as Debian's armhf, namely the
> ARMv7-A architecture with VFP3D16 coprocessor.  So 'uname -m' must
> output "armv7l" or better, and I guess the processor "Features" as
> reported by /proc/cpuinfo must include "vfpv3" and either "vfpd16"
> or "vfpd32".

Since it=E2=80=99s becoming a FAQ, could you add something along these line=
s to
the manual, right where armhf-linux is introduced?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.