From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Texlive-texmf Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 18:04:17 +0100 Message-ID: <87a8mfbii6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160225201935.GA24416@solar> <87io1bys72.fsf@gnu.org> <20160228083212.GA16394@solar> <87a8mhi5pc.fsf@gnu.org> <20160302100844.GA3539@solar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53291) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abWfo-0006rH-GG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 12:04:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abWfk-0002PI-G3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 12:04:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160302100844.GA3539@solar> (Andreas Enge's message of "Wed, 2 Mar 2016 11:08:44 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Andreas Enge skribis: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 10:34:23AM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> We don=E2=80=99t want people to have to do that, do we? :-) >> Personally, I don=E2=80=99t want to have to think beyond =E2=80=9Cguix p= ackage -i >> texlive=E2=80=9D. > > It is only about choice, you can always just install texlive if you are > ready to download gigabytes of data! > > Personally, I like to just download texlive-bin and to build texlive loca= lly > from a tarball stored locally on my hard disk, to avoid downloading all t= he > data. I understand, but this is hack to work around =E2=80=9Cbroken packaging=E2= =80=9D on our side (=E2=80=9Cbroken=E2=80=9D in the sense that it sucks in comparison to = what, say, Debian provides), not a great recipe that we want users to care about. > This was the original reason (plus easier debugging) that I kept the > internal packages -bin and -texmf public; I think it was a mistake, > since it seems to lead to a lot of confusion. > > So I will hide both the internal packages one of these days. OK. Ludo=E2=80=99.