From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add nlopt.
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 12:54:43 +0200
Message-ID: <87a8l3832k.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87vb3twtgi.fsf@gnu.org> <20160407154451.GD18750@jasmine>
	<87d1q1xhy1.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8l42yl4.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160409055628.GA21367@jasmine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46006)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mthl@gnu.org>) id 1aoqXU-0001lt-1D
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 06:54:52 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mthl@gnu.org>) id 1aoqXP-0005mP-Tt
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 06:54:51 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20160409055628.GA21367@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Sat,
	9 Apr 2016 01:56:28 -0400")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:

> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 12:18:15PM +0200, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
>> Roel Janssen <roel@gnu.org> writes:
>>=20
>> > Strangely enough, I couldn't apply it either.  I don't know what
>> > happened..  I regenerated the patch, and now I was able to apply it to
>> > my source tree.  Hopefully it works for you too now.
>>=20
>> This problem has already happened to me last year.  I suspect it is/was a
>> bug in Git.
>
> I've attached the diffoscope report (HTML) between the first two patches
> in this thread.

Do you mean =E2=80=9Cattached=E2=80=9D like in email attachment?  If so the=
n I don't see
the attachment...

> The diff header in the 'bad' patch says that the hunk applies to 7
> lines.  In the 'good' patch, the header instead says 6.
>
> The 'bad' patch can be applied when that parameter is changed to 6.
>
> I wonder if the bug can be reproduced?

That would be great.  :)

--=20
Mathieu Lirzin