From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: julia: Use unbundled release tarball. Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 20:28:19 +0200 Message-ID: <87a8jehu0s.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> References: <1464189924-29167-1-git-send-email-ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de> <1464189924-29167-3-git-send-email-ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de> <20160525174133.GA22300@debian-netbook> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34302) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5dXp-0005I4-0B for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2016 14:28:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5dXk-0000y2-Me for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2016 14:28:35 -0400 Received: from sinope02.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([141.80.25.24]:40897) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5dXk-0000wg-CL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2016 14:28:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160525174133.GA22300@debian-netbook> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Efraim Flashner Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Efraim Flashner writes: >> + ;; FIXME: The following inputs are downloaded from upstream to= allow us >> + ;; to use the lightweight Julia release tarball. Ideally, the= se inputs >> + ;; would eventually be replaced with proper Guix packages. >> + ("rmath-julia" >> + ,(origin >> + (method url-fetch) >> + (uri "https://api.github.com/repos/JuliaLang/Rmath-julia/t= arball/v0.1") >> + ;;(file-name "rmath-julia-0.1.tar.gz") > ^^^ > did this not like being renamed? Oops, this was not supposed to be commented. There was a problem where the build system complained about the hash of the tarball, and I could only fix it by *not* overriding the name. But this shouldn=E2=80=99t hav= e been part of the commit. I=E2=80=99ll play with this again to see if it can s= tay or needs to go. >> + (sha256 >> + (base32 >> + "0ai5dhjc43zcvangz123ryxmlbm51s21rg13bllwyn98w67arhb4"))= )) >> + ("suitesparse" >> + ,(origin >> + (method url-fetch) >> + (uri "http://faculty.cse.tamu.edu/davis/SuiteSparse/SuiteS= parse-4.4.2.tar.gz") >> + (sha256 >> + (base32 >> + "1dg0qsv07n71nbn9cgcvn73933rgy1jnxw5bfqkwfq3bidk44cqc"))= )) >> + ("objconv" >> + ,(origin >> + (method url-fetch) >> + (uri "http://www.agner.org/optimize/objconv.zip") >> + (sha256 >> + (base32 >> + "1fi7qa2sd9vb35dvkgripjf0fayzg2qmff215f8agfqfiwd1g8qs"))= )) >> + ("dsfmt" >> + ,(origin >> + (method url-fetch) >> + (uri (string-append >> + "http://www.math.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~m-mat/MT/" >> + "SFMT/dSFMT-src-2.2.3.tar.gz")) >> + (sha256 >> + (base32 >> + "03kaqbjbi6viz0n33dk5jlf6ayxqlsq4804n7kwkndiga9s4hd42"))= )) >> + ("virtualenv" > > we actually do have virtualenv packaged. I forgot when but at some poin= t > they made a massive jump in version numbers. Yes, I=E2=80=99ve seen that we have it, but it looks like julia doesn=E2=80= =99t make it easy to use our packaged version (and it insists on this old version). We should fix this eventually, but the goal of this patch was to make this dependency explicit =E2=80=94 before that it would just quietly take= the bundled =E2=80=9Cvirtualenv=E2=80=9D in the fat tarball. ~~ Ricardo