Re: core-updates vs. core-updates-next

[ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)]

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:14:09AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Hi!
>> 
>> leo@famulari.name (Leo Famulari) skribis:
>> 
>> > commit b0bbf2491e346a355c1ec5584c16de7fbfa14f5e
>> > Author: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
>> > Date:   Thu May 26 13:24:41 2016 -0400
>> >
>> >     gnu: expat: Remove replacement.
>> >     
>> >     * gnu/packages/xml.scm (expat)[replacement]: Remove field.
>> >     (expat/fixed): Remove variable.
>> 
>> [...]
>> 
>> > commit aee7f2e98ae2cbbd0cd765beda6c0a4279929c94
>> > Author: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
>> > Date:   Thu May 26 22:45:51 2016 -0400
>> >
>> >     gnu: libxslt: Update to 1.1.29.
>> >     
>> >     * gnu/packages/patches/libxslt-CVE-2015-7995.patch: Delete file.
>> >     * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Remove it.
>> >     * gnu/packages/xml.scm (libxslt): Update to 1.1.29.
>> >     [source]: Remove patch.
>> 
>> Clarification: until Hydra has started building all of core-updates,
>> it’s OK to push non-core updates like these to core-updates.
>> 
>> There are still a couple of issues at
>> <https://hydra.gnu.org/jobset/gnu/core-updates> to be fixed in the core
>> packages before we can ask Hydra to build all of core-updates.  Until
>> then, feel free!  :-)
>
> Okay, do you think I should move the commits from core-updates-next to
> core-updates?

Yes, please!  Just cherry-picking them and that should be fine.

Thank you,
Ludo’.