From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Wingo Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux-initrd: Introduce way to add more packages to initrd. Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 17:44:51 +0200 Message-ID: <87a8gwxzm4.fsf@igalia.com> References: <20160725074606.66hhcgeehmcsv2pf@venom> <20160725201002.7211-1-sleep_walker@gnu.org> <20160801103933.GD1062@venom> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53299) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bUFPO-0005AS-CS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 11:45:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bUFPJ-0003lU-1Z for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 11:45:37 -0400 Received: from pb-sasl1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.66]:50280 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bUFPI-0003dW-Se for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 11:45:32 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14122BAE4 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 11:44:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pb-sasl1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F622BAE3 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 11:44:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rusty (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2605E2BAE2 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 11:44:54 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20160801103933.GD1062@venom> (=?utf-8?B?IlRvbcOhxaEgxIxlY2gi?= =?utf-8?B?J3M=?= message of "Mon, 1 Aug 2016 12:39:33 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org On Mon 01 Aug 2016 12:39, Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 =C4=8Cech = writes: > Ping after week - is there interest in this patch? > > I know that > > - it doesn't apply cleanly as it depends on the other one I sent later > and was discussed > - documentation needs to be adjusted as well > > - it's a bit corner case but improves flexibility of the configuration > and is useful for debugging, early HW init, fixing filesystems from > initial tmpfs etc. > > WDYT? Makes sense to me; needs a documentation addition though. Andy