From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: GCC bootstrap failure on ARM Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:23:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87a8fc9pij.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h9dxukjm.fsf@gnu.org> <20160526165952.GA6576@solar> <87zirajjbk.fsf@gnu.org> <20160531193337.GA22008@solar> <87h9ddksi4.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87ziqy3c4j.fsf@gnu.org> <87y43qu8yw.fsf@netris.org> <87r39hc1kz.fsf@netris.org> <87bn0b1two.fsf@gnu.org> <8760q3opyl.fsf@gnu.org> <878tuwyg13.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33140) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjj0V-0001uz-I4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 04:23:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjj0R-0001sD-BN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 04:23:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: (David Craven's message of "Tue, 13 Sep 2016 08:11:22 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: David Craven Cc: guix-devel David Craven skribis: >> =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99 is now building with a tiny patch on gcc-= 4.9 (in fact >> it=E2=80=99s enough to apply it to gcc-cross-boot0, which is interesting= ): > > Does this also fix the bootstrap failure with gcc 5? Or is that too late > for this core-updates cycle? I think we should rather wait for the next cycle, because it=E2=80=99s like= ly to delay us further. Ludo=E2=80=99.