From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update e-mail address for ng0. Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 12:05:38 +0300 Message-ID: <87a8eb2r31.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20161010122844.12065-1-ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20161010122844.12065-2-ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87d1j88jx4.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87twckp83f.fsf@gmail.com> <87int0s0ts.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57268) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1btt0N-0004nB-58 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 05:05:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1btt0H-0002mn-5p for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 05:05:47 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-x241.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::241]:33042) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1btt0G-0002lu-Uo for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 05:05:41 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-x241.google.com with SMTP id l131so2547416lfl.0 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 02:05:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87int0s0ts.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> (ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is's message of "Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:03:43 +0000") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0 Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org ng0 (2016-10-10 15:03 +0000) wrote: > Alex Kost writes: > >> ng0 (2016-10-10 12:31 +0000) wrote: [...] >>> Additional question: is this incomplete? Do I have to add >>> ng0 >>> to this list aswell? >> >> You can check with "git --no-pager shortlog -nse". I'm not sure I >> follow the changes with your emails, but if you are satisfied with the >> output of that shortlog command after this patch, I will gladly apply >> it, thanks. > > Okay, I've just checked it and no old names / emails are displayed > on their own. Works for me. OK, the patch applied, thanks. -- Alex