From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Unused libgc-7.2 package? Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 22:29:41 +0100 Message-ID: <87a8cp6g1m.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20161121192650.GA21087@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41126) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9f6z-0003gy-Il for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 16:29:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9f6u-00062o-PC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 16:29:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20161121192650.GA21087@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:26:50 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari skribis: > Do we need the libgc-7.2 package anymore? AFAICT, nothing is using it, > but it's possible I missed something. Indeed, you can remove it. Efraim Flashner skribis: > You can add texinfo@4 to that list Right. Initially it was kept because it=E2=80=99s the last series that doe= sn=E2=80=99t use Perl and so it has a much smaller footprint. I=E2=80=99d keep it, but mostly out of nostalgia. :-) Ludo=E2=80=99.