From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52846)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1czgYO-0001Kk-Bh
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 05:33:09 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1czgYJ-0005qv-Ap
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 05:33:07 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51549)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1czgYJ-0005qJ-7z
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 05:33:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1czgYH-0002Ep-SY
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2017 05:33:01 -0400
Subject: bug#26454: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: add emacs-exwm
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.26454.B26454.14923351598577@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <20170411225803.2420-1-tumashu@163.com>
	<20170411225803.2420-2-tumashu@163.com>
	<e0a6e22f.AEEAJYt74U0AAAAAAAAAAAO0QTIAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABY7fT1@mailjet.com>
	<87inm9sdcs.fsf@gmail.com>
	<60b3e50e.AEEAJadpHi4AAAAAAAAAAAO0QTIAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABY7oh5@mailjet.com>
	<67fed3f6.1a3b.15b64e00dfd.Coremail.tumashu@163.com>
	<a5d4fcc6.ADsAAHLyj7wAAAAAAAAAAAO0QTIAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABY7wrc@mailjet.com>
	<87mvbj6w72.fsf@163.com>
	<4d35676d.AEUAI-hEBJAAAAAAAAAAAAO0QTIAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABY8M5G@mailjet.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 11:32:26 +0200
In-Reply-To: <4d35676d.AEUAI-hEBJAAAAAAAAAAAAO0QTIAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABY8M5G@mailjet.com>
	(Arun Isaac's message of "Fri, 14 Apr 2017 18:57:21 +0530")
Message-ID: <87a87gr93p.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net>
Cc: 26454@debbugs.gnu.org

Hello!

Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net> skribis:

>>> In your new patch, could you add a phase for generating this code from
>>> the xcb-proto xml files as well? Thanks!
>
>> I don't think it it a good idea, xcb-xproto.el provided by repo is
>> tested by developer. if we regenerate it, i don't know whether it
>> work or not.

That would effectively mean we don=E2=80=99t have the source code for this,
which would be a problem.

What about generating it, and if we do find differences compared to the
pre-compiled xcb-proto.el, then we can keep it in mind and report any
issues upstream?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.