From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Planning for the next release
Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 00:29:31 +0200
Message-ID: <87a86740xg.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87wpb7ym78.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20170331135732.pkobwwkzuojil4v3@abyayala> <877f35l8gf.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20170331163324.a7cj3m7u2zjstogw@abyayala>
	<20170331230741.GC9642@jasmine>
	<20170401071049.htgetlhfxrylc222@abyayala>
	<87wpb0318r.fsf@elephly.net> <8760gv9b0e.fsf@gnu.org>
	<874lwfpzri.fsf@elephly.net> <87r2zj7mhg.fsf@gnu.org>
	<871srji4nw.fsf@elephly.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45670)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1dCCsU-0004hj-NM
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 May 2017 18:29:39 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1dCCsQ-00010K-QG
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 May 2017 18:29:38 -0400
In-Reply-To: <871srji4nw.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Sat,
	20 May 2017 23:45:07 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> skribis:

> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>>>> Not a release blocker, but a kind of general blocker: we have a =E2=80=
=98guix
>>>> offload=E2=80=99 bug for which we need more testers and hackers to get=
 better
>>>> debugging info: <https://bugs.gnu.org/26976>.
>>>
>>> I=E2=80=99ll try to give this a try either tonight or tomorrow.
>>
>> Great!
>>
>> Regardless of what happens with #26976, I can run =E2=80=9Cmake release=
=E2=80=9D and
>> upload the tarballs tomorrow, and presumably send out the announcement
>> on Monday.
>>
>> How does that sound?
>
> That sounds good!
>
> Should this bug be mentioned somewhere (in the release tarball) as a
> known issue with 0.13.0?

I don=E2=80=99t know, maybe not.

Ludo=E2=80=99.