From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49291)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dkHhO-0001Vl-Vv
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 18:31:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dkHhO-0002eF-4z
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 18:31:02 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41372)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1dkHhO-0002eA-1N
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 18:31:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dkHhN-0002K0-OI
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 18:31:01 -0400
Subject: [bug#27977] [PATCH 1/2] services: herd: Fix matching ok responses
	from shepherd service.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.27977.D27977.15034410317130@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <20170805222646.149cb45a@cbaines.net>
	<20170805213034.1012-1-mail@cbaines.net> <87h8wz38hf.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20170822174452.3784d96c@cbaines.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 00:30:21 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20170822174452.3784d96c@cbaines.net> (Christopher Baines's
	message of "Tue, 22 Aug 2017 17:44:52 +0100")
Message-ID: <87a82rnsle.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net>
Cc: 27977-done@debbugs.gnu.org

Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> skribis:

> On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 17:52:44 +0200
> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote:
>
>> Probably this patch is better than reverting.
>>=20
>> Thoughts?
>
> I had to apply that patch with --ignore-whitespace-change, as the code
> in the middle of (current-services) has been indented outside of that
> patch.

Right, sorry about that (I have -bB in =E2=80=98vc-diff-switches=E2=80=99).

> I think I get what is going on. As far as I understand it, the (match
> results ((services _ ...) ... bit is equivilent to the use of first in
> the other procedures, which suggests to me that you could use first in
> (current-services)? I'm guessing that the only difference is that they
> will fail differently on the empty list?

Yes.  I=E2=80=99ve pushed it as 7d14082d56462f7bef4254d65a21fd265fbce471.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.