From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Let's build 'core-updates'!
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 09:56:51 +0100
Message-ID: <87a7zzeqek.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87wp382zgh.fsf@fastmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58755)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1eBdDH-0005Q0-FL
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 03:57:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1eBdDC-0004VN-RV
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 03:56:59 -0500
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a01:474::1]:48215)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1eBdDC-0004V0-JZ
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 03:56:54 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87wp382zgh.fsf@fastmail.com> (Marius Bakke's message of "Thu, 02
	Nov 2017 21:33:02 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hello,

Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> skribis:

> Is there anything else we should consider this round?  Maybe the
> automatic wrapping from <https://bugs.gnu.org/27003>?

Yesterday I submitted this license installation patch, which should be
simple enough:

  https://bugs.gnu.org/29161

Other than that, I think we shouldn=E2=80=99t wait for too long.

Thanks for pinging!

Ludo=E2=80=99.