From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45989) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCvg6-0003sw-Hp for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:52:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCvg3-0003TD-FZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:52:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52344) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCvg3-0003T9-C0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:52:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eCvg3-0000MY-5K for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 17:52:03 -0500 Subject: [bug#29232] [PATCH] gnu: qemu: Fix CVE-2017-{15038,15268,15289}. Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <98773909c59c0ca327584f7d20ec35eedff74c79.1510251328.git.leo@famulari.name> Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 23:51:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: <98773909c59c0ca327584f7d20ec35eedff74c79.1510251328.git.leo@famulari.name> (Leo Famulari's message of "Thu, 9 Nov 2017 13:15:53 -0500") Message-ID: <87a7zvhxq3.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 29232@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, Leo Famulari skribis: > What do you think of fetching the patches like this, instead of copying > them into the Guix source tree? I think it=E2=80=99s OK. If the Gitweb instance disappears, or if it chang= es somehow, hopefully the patch itself will still have the same hash, so we can always change to different URL or a local file. > * gnu/packages/virtualization.scm (qemu-patch): Use HTTPS. > (qemu)[source]: Use qemu-patch. [=E2=80=A6] > + (qemu-patch "7bd92756303f2158a68d5166264dc30139b813b6" > + "qemu-CVE-2017-15038.patch" > + (base32 > + "0wpgf8ivjdbaihf2l7720h1fydh7kdl36wj2nchjd9irfk= hw399q")) > + (qemu-patch "a7b20a8efa28e5f22c26c06cd06c2f12bc863493" > + "qemu-CVE-2017-15268.patch" > + (base32 > + "1adhwj91pmgbmdvyrkvslbfsyz7l00xdrr6vzps6s58q5i= dvdp79")) > + (qemu-patch "eb38e1bc3740725ca29a535351de94107ec58d51" > + "qemu-CVE-2017-15289.patch" > + (base32 > + "1zshrlzbwgwrsnimbq8kqr7injd65ncsr8a4lrmgyfv185= ma4z8d")))) I trust these commits correspond to these CVEs. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.