From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: bug#30097: [core-updates] nspr 4.17 not reproducible Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 20:51:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87a7xgdxs9.fsf@fastmail.com> References: <87fu78e1lh.fsf@fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38143) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eaoK5-00013f-T4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:52:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eaoK2-0006Vo-QP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:52:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48439) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eaoK2-0006VM-MI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:52:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eaoK2-0005wa-8z for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:52:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Cc: 30097@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable G=C3=A1bor Boskovits writes: > 2018-01-14 19:28 GMT+01:00 Marius Bakke : > >> G=C3=A1bor Boskovits writes: >> >> > nspr 4.17 is not reproducible. >> > Diffoscope output attached. >> >> Thanks for the report! >> >> The attached patch should solve it. Since there are quite a few >> dependent packages, I'd like to push this to a new 'staging' branch that >> will be started shortly after the core-updates merge. WDYT? >> >> Yes, it should go to a branch. > > I also don't know if this fixes the difference also, where an additional ; > is present... > Could you check this, or should I run a test with the patch? > It seems like a 2 byte difference. It passes `guix build --rounds=3D2`, so I'm not sure what was up with that = ";". --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlpbtLYACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPr9bQf/eEPeXj4VPIs6tudDZSmrqgH3niiG4CQ5AUFxDsv7K575eMmIgTGmcoYv PBaZZ31Q/f5y+RgFvCUUFE75rEfrQ3QCxLUBQJjXwQGv04pCA80vbJJ/C9C2lY5A U3VFMVRNvKNB4UiJ3qJEIam6Lily6wu9OEqOL6298uDR44QO1NnVDY36V5/qKmJ8 M662OgV6TPeRdQWddcH0M+u91wa+7UbYE8Y6WMpxCvlOSmS7hyN6w445/kwhUrXn Z7s5nZbyVWR2qfqYvIBrg2SBo0iQ7zDNq7ww7AarJ8fcWL8QDC0wFj75+U4Mr14R dxd0Ur80BiXoX+lnMwCaAB5QUvkwnw== =+8gK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--