From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Baines Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ruby on Rails (web-application framework) Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2018 21:48:08 +0000 Message-ID: <87a7vorftz.fsf@cbaines.net> References: <87shan9lcy.fsf@cbaines.net> <87r2p0ri8x.fsf@cbaines.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44568) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1esF0v-0002lf-KF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2018 16:48:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1esF0s-0004ye-H1 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2018 16:48:21 -0500 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:fe69:8da9]:50114) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1esF0s-0004yG-8n for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2018 16:48:18 -0500 In-reply-to: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Cc: Guix-devel , 30689@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable G=C3=A1bor Boskovits writes: > 2018-03-03 21:55 GMT+01:00 Christopher Baines : > >> Tags: moreinfo >> >> Let's use this bug to track the process of packaging Ruby on Rails. >> >> My current plan is to take chunks of the packages from the wip-rails-2 >> [1] branch here, check them over, and then send them up for review. >> >> If anyone else wants to join in, that would be great. >> >> > This would be great! Actually I would really like to see redmine on GuixSD > :) > Please keep me in line. I'm willing to help. Should I join in taking the > packages > or just the review? Either would be great, I've send through patches for the first few packages for review already. If you do look at working on the packages, just make sure to keep this bug up to date. Thanks, Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAlqbGBhfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9Xdk3w//bjKcTPVO8DJh66zmUpJjvhUGIG+jTh+fw4a5xwM8o0hBE9GV3ygFECFS 3oM8u37kDPx1BtuNUVyBpB3m5ExNDQ5sDf/U5Q8Hwf/Zva3MJLZYODPRPN6Dxtpb C1oNj9JTRmzVoVs4QYhSOzi0AQy6Ueuiz0OuS0aFWpqRtxs7/ZtzlR5R9DolOF/4 fRGRaRwcCt/0Vm4um+x8KpDLxR1TlOQVRZOb0gM/O5Fm7TuIw2YKgcfWbjtt4Ix4 doZEvQDNagNM869r9YYCljGC/BcyMx5zeo8jZws/xGyzVaoF0XAhg1yCyV8ur6Td EqA+eT/FTTPpt6YXfsET2BL20SQtIe8VkWIWag46KgXwbmgNRhAWDrT2PDvpUrco m2NMq0cqi6zNR2PNJds43pOu2XZbiQMfRdl9JnX1Ot42WH0GrEmXQ5iA453isXLj vrf06SviL/J71O7vobBgMBnM9NsG2KCOURvFUM98WEFAreuFB1LPg7AnBnLey34i BfwRSz2KgOhpoJnsdWqqYieDKNbwQZXzBL0Gb4e1RlFjjLspnkywUqNSSmLtpGry AnQwedKyWK7++RY0QpMiv9IHlik9E14KdSu1ooJzwT5SgZAuv/iCmgAxpqrN0Dq+ n+sFZ8Gim9Lq4aMzbXp0WJfOEMCB01Vm385pZ3McPq9I1pIXmFA= =7gvq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--