From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33995)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1etasL-0000Cx-UL
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 10:21:06 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1etasI-0004BY-Kr
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 10:21:05 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41779)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1etasI-0004BL-H4
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 10:21:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1etasI-0000VD-B3
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2018 10:21:02 -0500
Subject: [bug#30572] [PATCH 3/7] system: Allow customization of the initrd's
	Guile.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.30572.B30572.15204360561898@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <handler.30572.B.151929540925748.ack@debbugs.gnu.org>
	<20180222103528.5108-1-cmmarusich@gmail.com>
	<20180222103528.5108-3-cmmarusich@gmail.com>
	<87371t8bt2.fsf@gmail.com> <87muzuz7nj.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87o9k0ig3n.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 16:20:46 +0100
In-Reply-To: <87o9k0ig3n.fsf@gmail.com> (Chris Marusich's message of "Wed, 07
	Mar 2018 06:56:12 +0100")
Message-ID: <87a7vjsyi9.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com>
Cc: 30572@debbugs.gnu.org

Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com> skribis:

> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:
>
>> Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com> skribis:
>>
>>>  @deffn {Monadic Procedure} base-initrd @var{file-systems} @
>>> -       [#:mapped-devices '()] [#:qemu-networking? #f] [#:volatile-root=
? #f]@
>>> +       [#:linux linux-libre]
>>> +       [#:mapped-devices '()] [#:guile %guile-static-stripped]
>>> +       [#:qemu-networking? #f] [#:volatile-root? #f]@
>>
>> Nitpick: you need an @ at the end of intermediate lines.  :-)
>
> Thank you; I appreciate nit-picking, since these are the kinds of things
> that are easy to overlook!  I've added the @ symbols (see attached).
> However, are they really necessary?
>
> According to (texinfo) Multiple Spaces, inserting an @ followed by a
> newline inserts a single space into the output.  That's what we're doing
> here, right?  But even when I omit the @ symbols at the end of the
> lines, the TexInfo manual builds without error, and the procedure
> definition appears to render just fine in the stand-alone Info reader.
> Unless the intent here really is to insert just one extra space between
> some, but not all, of the arguments, I think we can probably omit all of
> these @ symbols.  WDYT?

It surely builds without error, but I think Texinfo considers the lines
that follow the @deffn line as the body of @deffn and not as the
continuation of the @deffn line.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.