From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: Berlin substitute server "Bad Read-Header-Line header: # Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 15:10:54 +0100 Message-ID: <87a7mnobrl.fsf@nckx> References: <20181101191731.GA4117@jasmine.lan> <87zhur7mo7.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net> <87r2g0o3nz.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59529) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJfao-00046C-2S for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 09:11:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJfan-0004pL-5F for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 09:11:02 -0500 In-reply-to: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: swedebugia Cc: help-guix swedebugia (nomen est omen :-), swedebugia wrote: > On 2018-11-04 23:53, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> For the record, this was due to lack of disk space on that=20 >> machine > (nginx was unable to reply at all.) > Could we catch cases like these and print a nice error instead=20 > of a > backtrace? > > If you point me to the right line and file I could try writing a=20 > patch :D I'll leave this[0] here in case it's the same 'bug'. The=20 *.http.response reproducers were nothing but a bunch of nohupped=20 netcats and no longer work. If it is related, I could dig up & bang my half-finished patch=20 into shape & submit it. If not, it might point you to the right area to start digging. Kind regards, T G-R [0]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D26489